Kent State

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

51.2%Kent State

48.8%Buffalo

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBuffalo -0.3

PROJECTED TOTAL163.4

MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -105

Buffalo

17-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreKent State 82

Projected Total163.4

Projected ScoreBuffalo 82

Team Comparison

Kent StateMetricBuffalo

54.7MMH Power Index49.7

113.9Offensive Efficiency114.9

107.6Defensive Efficiency112.2

6.3Net Efficiency2.7

-0.1Strength of Schedule0.0

2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.9

74.0Tempo67.9

53.0%Effective FG%56.1%

17.7%Turnover Rate16.1%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %27.6%

43.5%Free Throw Rate40.4%

4.7Average Margin1.8

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Kent State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKent State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–49.7), defensive efficiency (107.6–112.2), net efficiency (6.3–2.7), recent form (2.1–-5.9).

Buffalo COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (114.9–113.9), strength of schedule (0.0–-0.1), shooting efficiency (56.1–53.0).

Final

Kent State

87—81

Buffalo

Kent State by 6 • 70.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Kent StateTEAM STATBuffalo

31-63FG26-58

49.0%FG%45.0%

11-283PT10-24

39.0%3PT%42.0%

14-18FT19-27

78.0%FT%70.0%

46Rebounds29

13Offensive Rebounds6

25Assists23

12Turnovers5

3Steals10

3Blocks2

19Fouls17

Player Box Score

Kent State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Delrecco Gillespie	F	40	9-12	1-1	1-1	15	5	1	2	20
Rob Whaley Jr.	F	33	6-14	1-3	3-5	10	2	1	1	16
Cian Medley	G	32	4-10	2-7	5-6	0	12	0	0	15
Quinn Woidke	G	29	5-8	4-7	1-1	2	1	0	0	15
Morgan Safford	G	32	2-7	1-2	4-5	10	2	1	0	9
Rayvon Griffith	F	19	4-7	1-4	0-0	5	2	0	0	9
Brenden Moss	G	3	1-4	1-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Jahari Williamson	G	10	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Magnus Entenmann	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Buffalo

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Daniel Freitag	G	38	11-26	6-13	5-8	3	7	3	0	33
Ryan Sabol	G	36	6-12	4-8	0-0	2	6	1	0	16
Tim Oboh	C	26	4-8	0-0	5-9	5	1	0	2	13
Noah Batchelor	G	24	2-3	0-1	2-2	6	0	0	0	6
Ezra McKenna	F	13	1-2	0-1	4-4	2	2	1	0	6
Angelo Brizzi	G	29	1-3	0-0	2-3	2	3	4	0	4
Mikhail Pocknett	F	18	1-3	0-0	1-1	5	1	0	0	3
Derrick Talton Jr.	G	16	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	3	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.2Possessions70.2

123.9Offensive Efficiency115.4

115.4Defensive Efficiency123.9

8.5Net Efficiency-8.5

57.9%Effective FG%53.4%

60.8%True Shooting %57.2%

17.0%Turnover Rate7.2%

28.6%Free Throw Rate46.6%

44.4%3-Point Rate41.4%

2.08Assist / Turnover4.60

Game Summary

Kent State won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 70.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.