Boston College

11-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

10.4%Boston College

89.6%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -14.6

PROJECTED TOTAL136.0

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -862

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreBoston College 61

Projected Total136.0

Projected ScoreClemson 75

Team Comparison

Boston CollegeMetricClemson

45.1MMH Power Index59.9

100.0Offensive Efficiency112.6

104.8Defensive Efficiency101.4

-4.8Net Efficiency11.2

4.8Strength of Schedule4.6

-14.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

67.4Tempo63.6

47.1%Effective FG%53.0%

15.4%Turnover Rate14.0%

28.1%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

33.2%Free Throw Rate38.1%

-3.3Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY89.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–45.1), offensive efficiency (112.6–100.0), defensive efficiency (101.4–104.8), net efficiency (11.2–-4.8).

Boston College COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.8–4.6), offensive rebounding (28.1–27.0).

Final

Boston College

50—74

Clemson

Clemson by 24 • 65.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Boston CollegeTEAM STATClemson

20-47FG25-54

43.0%FG%46.0%

5-153PT8-19

33.0%3PT%42.0%

5-13FT16-23

38.0%FT%70.0%

30Rebounds35

6Offensive Rebounds10

9Assists12

19Turnovers10

7Steals9

8Blocks4

19Fouls15

Player Box Score

Boston College

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Fred Payne	G	34	7-17	2-4	4-4	3	2	1	0	20
Jayden Hastings	F	28	4-5	0-0	1-4	7	1	1	6	9
Boden Kapke	F	25	4-5	1-1	0-0	8	0	0	0	9
Luka Toews	G	26	3-9	2-5	0-0	3	2	2	0	8
Caleb Steger	G	17	2-3	0-1	0-0	4	0	0	0	4
Donald Hand Jr.	G	31	0-3	0-1	0-0	2	3	0	0	0
Aidan Shaw	G	24	0-2	0-1	0-3	3	0	2	2	0
Chase Forte	G	9	0-2	0-1	0-2	0	1	1	0	0
Marko Radunovic	G	6	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Nick Davidson	F	25	8-11	4-6	5-5	3	0	2	1	25
Carter Welling	F	31	4-9	0-1	2-4	8	3	1	2	10
RJ Godfrey	F	14	2-5	0-0	6-10	8	0	0	0	10
Dillon Hunter	G	35	4-5	1-2	0-1	7	5	0	0	9
Butta Johnson	G	20	2-3	1-1	2-2	0	1	1	0	7
Ace Buckner	G	15	2-6	1-3	1-1	1	1	3	0	6
Jestin Porter	G	30	2-9	1-4	0-0	2	1	2	1	5
Dallas Thomas	F	1	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Jake Wahlin	F	18	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Chase Thompson	F	9	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Trent Steinour	F	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.6Possessions65.6

76.2Offensive Efficiency112.8

112.8Defensive Efficiency76.2

-36.6Net Efficiency36.6

47.9%Effective FG%53.7%

47.0%True Shooting %57.0%

28.7%Turnover Rate15.4%

27.7%Free Throw Rate42.6%

31.9%3-Point Rate35.2%

0.47Assist / Turnover1.20

Game Summary

Clemson won by 24 points. The game played at approximately 65.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.