Virginia Tech logo

Virginia Tech

19-13
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.0%Virginia Tech
74.0%SMU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSMU -7.3
PROJECTED TOTAL161.6
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -285
SMU logo

SMU

20-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreVirginia Tech 77
Projected Total161.6
Projected ScoreSMU 84

Team Comparison

57.7MMH Power Index62.5
112.8Offensive Efficiency118.2
107.2Defensive Efficiency109.6
5.6Net Efficiency8.6
5.8Strength of Schedule7.0
-3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.3
69.8Tempo71.1
52.3%Effective FG%55.7%
14.9%Turnover Rate15.7%
31.1%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
34.7%Free Throw Rate31.3%
3.9Average Margin6.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

SMU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY74.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–57.7), offensive efficiency (118.2–112.8), net efficiency (8.6–5.6), strength of schedule (7.0–5.8).
Virginia Tech COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.2–109.6), ball security (14.9–15.7), free throw rate (34.7–31.3).
Final
Virginia Tech logo
Virginia Tech
76—77
SMU logo
SMU
SMU by 1 • 69.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Virginia TechTEAM STATSMU
28-61FG29-60
46.0%FG%48.0%
9-283PT3-15
32.0%3PT%20.0%
11-18FT16-23
61.0%FT%70.0%
36Rebounds38
12Offensive Rebounds11
15Assists14
10Turnovers11
9Steals5
2Blocks5
16Fouls15

Player Box Score

Virginia Tech
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jailen BedfordG299-173-81-271100022
Jaden SchuttG215-74-61-130100015
Ben HammondG355-101-30-125200011
Neoklis AvdalasG364-120-72-207200010
Tobi LawalF243-51-33-580020010
Amani HansberryF282-80-12-58010006
Christian GurdakC160-10-02-22120002
Antonio DornC110-10-00-03100000
SMU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Boopie MillerG356-151-611-1646200024
Samet YigitogluC327-90-00-131020014
Jaron Pierre Jr.G315-92-31-191000013
Jaden ToombsC286-120-30-0101010012
Corey WashingtonF252-40-14-55000008
B.J. EdwardsG332-70-10-01420004
Jermaine O'Neal Jr.F131-40-10-02112002
B.J. Davis-RayG30-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

69.3Possessions69.3
109.7Offensive Efficiency111.1
111.1Defensive Efficiency109.7
-1.4Net Efficiency1.4
53.3%Effective FG%50.8%
54.6%True Shooting %54.3%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.5%
29.5%Free Throw Rate38.3%
45.9%3-Point Rate25.0%
1.50Assist / Turnover1.27
Game Summary
SMU won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 69.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.