Boise State logo

Boise State

20-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
55.9%Boise State
44.1%UNLV
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBoise State -0.7
PROJECTED TOTAL157.7
MODEL MONEYLINEBoise State -127
UNLV logo

UNLV

18-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBoise State 79
Projected Total157.7
Projected ScoreUNLV 78

Team Comparison

59.5MMH Power Index52.8
113.9Offensive Efficiency111.0
107.1Defensive Efficiency109.6
6.8Net Efficiency1.4
4.2Strength of Schedule2.7
5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency1.1
68.6Tempo71.4
52.7%Effective FG%53.7%
17.0%Turnover Rate17.2%
33.8%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
42.7%Free Throw Rate41.6%
4.7Average Margin1.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Boise State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY55.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBoise State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.5–52.8), offensive efficiency (113.9–111.0), defensive efficiency (107.1–109.6), net efficiency (6.8–1.4).
UNLV COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.7–52.7).
Final
Boise State logo
Boise State
85—89
UNLV logo
UNLV
UNLV by 4 • 80.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Boise StateTEAM STATUNLV
30-61FG31-66
49.0%FG%47.0%
3-143PT7-21
21.0%3PT%33.0%
22-29FT20-28
76.0%FT%71.0%
33Rebounds40
8Offensive Rebounds14
16Assists16
15Turnovers13
9Steals9
3Blocks5
26Fouls26

Player Box Score

Boise State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Drew FielderC388-171-46-841100023
Andrew MeadowF388-120-25-861200021
Dylan AndrewsG304-80-16-624100014
Pearson CarmichaelF184-91-35-640110014
Dominic ParolinF334-70-10-17120008
Spencer AhrensF192-41-20-01101005
Aginaldo NetoG260-40-10-02311000
RJ Keene IIG230-00-00-04510000
UNLV
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dra Gibbs-LawhornG4511-232-89-1256100033
Howie Fleming Jr.G356-133-62-244100017
Kimani HamiltonF355-91-35-652100016
Issac WilliamsonG224-61-30-04010009
Tyrin JonesF332-70-02-34243006
Emmanuel StephenC263-50-00-16001006
Jacob BannarbieF180-30-12-48201002
Al GreenG90-00-00-00000000
Walter BrownF20-00-00-00010000

Advanced Game Stats

80.1Possessions80.1
106.1Offensive Efficiency111.1
111.1Defensive Efficiency106.1
-5.0Net Efficiency5.0
51.6%Effective FG%52.3%
56.8%True Shooting %56.1%
18.3%Turnover Rate16.6%
47.5%Free Throw Rate42.4%
23.0%3-Point Rate31.8%
1.07Assist / Turnover1.23
Game Summary
UNLV won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 80.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.