
Radford
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
86.6%Radford
13.4%Gardner-Webb
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADRadford -12.4
PROJECTED TOTAL160.6
MODEL MONEYLINERadford -646

Gardner-Webb
4-29MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRadford 87
Projected Total160.6
Projected ScoreGardner-Webb 74
Team Comparison
47.9MMH Power Index26.6
110.9Offensive Efficiency96.0
107.4Defensive Efficiency120.4
3.5Net Efficiency-24.4
-4.6Strength of Schedule3.3
2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-18.2
73.4Tempo71.0
52.6%Effective FG%48.8%
17.0%Turnover Rate19.2%
31.4%Offensive Rebound %23.6%
41.0%Free Throw Rate31.5%
2.5Average Margin-17.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Radford HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY86.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRadford holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–26.6), offensive efficiency (110.9–96.0), defensive efficiency (107.4–120.4), net efficiency (3.5–-24.4).
Gardner-Webb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.3–-4.6).