
Colgate
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
59.4%Colgate
40.6%Loyola Maryland
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -1.2
PROJECTED TOTAL154.0
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -146

Loyola Maryland
12-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColgate 78
Projected Total154.0
Projected ScoreLoyola Maryland 76
Team Comparison
48.8MMH Power Index40.8
111.7Offensive Efficiency108.1
109.0Defensive Efficiency110.7
2.7Net Efficiency-2.6
-2.0Strength of Schedule-5.0
-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.1
68.4Tempo69.6
54.5%Effective FG%51.2%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.7%
26.9%Offensive Rebound %29.4%
30.0%Free Throw Rate31.0%
1.8Average Margin-1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.8–40.8), offensive efficiency (111.7–108.1), defensive efficiency (109.0–110.7), net efficiency (2.7–-2.6).
Loyola Maryland COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (29.4–26.9), free throw rate (31.0–30.0).