
Niagara
8-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
42.6%Niagara
57.4%Canisius
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCanisius -3.2
PROJECTED TOTAL132.5
MODEL MONEYLINECanisius -135

Canisius
10-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNiagara 65
Projected Total132.5
Projected ScoreCanisius 68
Team Comparison
35.8MMH Power Index33.9
100.8Offensive Efficiency97.1
112.4Defensive Efficiency108.8
-11.6Net Efficiency-11.7
-0.8Strength of Schedule-1.8
-5.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.0
63.4Tempo64.8
50.9%Effective FG%46.8%
18.8%Turnover Rate19.6%
24.9%Offensive Rebound %29.1%
27.3%Free Throw Rate32.4%
-7.4Average Margin-7.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Niagara HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY57.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNiagara holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (35.8–33.9), offensive efficiency (100.8–97.1), net efficiency (-11.6–-11.7), strength of schedule (-0.8–-1.8).
Canisius COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.8–112.4), offensive rebounding (29.1–24.9), free throw rate (32.4–27.3).