UAB

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

71.0%UAB

29.0%Tulane

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUAB -5.0

PROJECTED TOTAL152.6

MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -245

Tulane

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUAB 79

Projected Total152.6

Projected ScoreTulane 74

Team Comparison

UABMetricTulane

56.9MMH Power Index44.3

110.5Offensive Efficiency105.3

102.9Defensive Efficiency109.9

7.6Net Efficiency-4.6

0.4Strength of Schedule2.7

2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

71.7Tempo68.7

48.8%Effective FG%49.6%

12.4%Turnover Rate15.6%

32.7%Offensive Rebound %22.8%

36.9%Free Throw Rate44.8%

5.4Average Margin-3.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–44.3), offensive efficiency (110.5–105.3), defensive efficiency (102.9–109.9), net efficiency (7.6–-4.6).

Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–0.4), shooting efficiency (49.6–48.8), free throw rate (44.8–36.9).

Final

UAB

82—69

Tulane

UAB by 13 • 69.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UABTEAM STATTulane

30-65FG24-60

46.0%FG%40.0%

5-133PT7-27

38.0%3PT%26.0%

17-18FT14-19

94.0%FT%74.0%

45Rebounds27

15Offensive Rebounds8

18Assists14

10Turnovers10

9Steals4

1Blocks8

16Fouls17

Player Box Score

UAB

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
KyeRon Lindsay-Martin	F	29	7-13	0-0	5-5	12	2	1	0	19
Daniel Rivera	F	34	7-10	0-0	3-3	7	1	1	0	17
Jacob Meyer	G	30	6-16	2-4	0-0	6	1	2	0	14
Chance Westry	G	30	3-8	0-1	3-4	7	8	1	0	9
Salim London	G	26	2-6	2-4	2-2	5	2	2	1	8
Ahmad Robinson	G	18	3-4	0-1	2-2	1	1	1	0	8
Evan Chatman	F	17	1-6	0-1	2-2	4	1	0	0	4
Dayjaun Anderson	G	11	1-2	1-2	0-0	1	2	1	0	3
Quaran McPherson	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Tulane

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rowan Brumbaugh	G	38	5-12	1-4	5-7	4	6	1	0	16
Asher Woods	G	34	4-11	1-3	7-9	3	2	1	0	16
Tyler Ringgold	F	16	5-6	2-3	0-1	5	0	1	0	12
Scotty Middleton	F	33	4-14	1-8	0-0	5	3	0	3	9
Curtis Williams Jr.	G	34	3-9	2-7	0-0	3	0	1	1	8
Josiah Moore	G	14	1-4	0-1	2-2	3	1	0	2	4
Percy Daniels	C	14	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	2	2
KJ Greene	G	11	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	2	0	0	2
Davion Bradford	C	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.8Possessions69.8

117.5Offensive Efficiency98.9

98.9Defensive Efficiency117.5

18.6Net Efficiency-18.6

50.0%Effective FG%45.8%

55.7%True Shooting %50.0%

14.6%Turnover Rate14.1%

27.7%Free Throw Rate31.7%

20.0%3-Point Rate45.0%

1.80Assist / Turnover1.40

Game Summary

UAB won by 13 points. The game played at approximately 69.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.