Rice logo

Rice

13-18
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
75.4%Rice
24.6%UTSA
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADRice -6.7
PROJECTED TOTAL151.3
MODEL MONEYLINERice -307
UTSA logo

UTSA

5-25
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRice 79
Projected Total151.3
Projected ScoreUTSA 72

Team Comparison

RiceMetricUTSA
45.1MMH Power Index30.5
108.3Offensive Efficiency99.0
109.2Defensive Efficiency115.0
-0.9Net Efficiency-16.0
-2.2Strength of Schedule-1.2
-4.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.6
68.3Tempo70.2
49.7%Effective FG%45.9%
17.8%Turnover Rate17.0%
35.7%Offensive Rebound %30.9%
34.7%Free Throw Rate29.9%
-0.6Average Margin-11.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Rice HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY75.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRice holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.1–30.5), offensive efficiency (108.3–99.0), defensive efficiency (109.2–115.0), net efficiency (-0.9–-16.0).
UTSA COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.2–-2.2), ball security (17.0–17.8).
Final
Rice logo
Rice
89—73
UTSA logo
UTSA
Rice by 16 • 61.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

RiceTEAM STATUTSA
30-54FG27-62
56.0%FG%44.0%
16-313PT8-28
52.0%3PT%29.0%
13-19FT11-13
68.0%FT%85.0%
31Rebounds32
11Offensive Rebounds15
19Assists7
9Turnovers9
6Steals6
4Blocks4
17Fouls18

Player Box Score

Rice
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Trae BroadnaxG347-112-44-637200020
Nick AndersonG265-124-85-750000019
Jalen SmithG356-135-111-262000018
Cam CarrollG313-63-52-206200011
Andrew AkuchieF93-30-01-23100007
Eternity EguagieF152-21-10-01010005
Jordan WilliamsG132-41-20-02310005
Jimmy Oladokun Jr.F52-20-00-01000004
Stephen GiwaC260-10-00-07004000
Trey PattersonF60-00-00-01000000
UTSA
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Baboucarr NjieF369-141-44-493130023
Dorian HayesG376-114-92-211000018
Austin NunezG326-182-62-252100016
Kaidon RayfieldF232-50-12-27021006
Matheo CoffiF202-31-20-07000005
Jamir SimpsonG312-90-40-00010004
Brent MossG130-10-11-31000001
LJ BrownG60-10-10-00110000
Daniel AkitobyF20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

61.6Possessions61.6
144.5Offensive Efficiency118.5
118.5Defensive Efficiency144.5
26.0Net Efficiency-26.0
70.4%Effective FG%50.0%
70.6%True Shooting %53.5%
14.7%Turnover Rate14.5%
35.2%Free Throw Rate21.0%
57.4%3-Point Rate45.2%
2.11Assist / Turnover0.78
Game Summary
Rice won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 61.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.