
Rice
13-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
75.4%Rice
24.6%UTSA
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADRice -6.7
PROJECTED TOTAL151.3
MODEL MONEYLINERice -307

UTSA
5-25MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRice 79
Projected Total151.3
Projected ScoreUTSA 72
Team Comparison
45.1MMH Power Index30.5
108.3Offensive Efficiency99.0
109.2Defensive Efficiency115.0
-0.9Net Efficiency-16.0
-2.2Strength of Schedule-1.2
-4.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.6
68.3Tempo70.2
49.7%Effective FG%45.9%
17.8%Turnover Rate17.0%
35.7%Offensive Rebound %30.9%
34.7%Free Throw Rate29.9%
-0.6Average Margin-11.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Rice HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRice holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.1–30.5), offensive efficiency (108.3–99.0), defensive efficiency (109.2–115.0), net efficiency (-0.9–-16.0).
UTSA COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.2–-2.2), ball security (17.0–17.8).