Portland

15-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

49.8%Portland

50.2%Pepperdine

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPepperdine -0.8

PROJECTED TOTAL154.9

MODEL MONEYLINEPepperdine -101

Pepperdine

9-23

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePortland 77

Projected Total154.9

Projected ScorePepperdine 78

Team Comparison

PortlandMetricPepperdine

42.7MMH Power Index38.2

104.8Offensive Efficiency103.2

110.6Defensive Efficiency113.6

-5.8Net Efficiency-10.4

1.8Strength of Schedule0.7

-8.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

71.0Tempo70.0

52.0%Effective FG%48.7%

19.3%Turnover Rate18.3%

28.7%Offensive Rebound %31.1%

36.9%Free Throw Rate34.0%

-4.1Average Margin-7.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Portland HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY50.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPortland holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.7–38.2), offensive efficiency (104.8–103.2), defensive efficiency (110.6–113.6), net efficiency (-5.8–-10.4).

Pepperdine COUNTERS WITHball security (18.3–19.3), offensive rebounding (31.1–28.7).

Final

Portland

63—67

Pepperdine

Pepperdine by 4 • 67.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PortlandTEAM STATPepperdine

25-66FG24-53

38.0%FG%45.0%

7-333PT7-23

21.0%3PT%30.0%

6-9FT12-20

67.0%FT%60.0%

38Rebounds36

14Offensive Rebounds9

18Assists9

12Turnovers13

7Steals9

3Blocks—

19Fouls13

Player Box Score

Portland

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Cameron Williams	F	31	5-12	1-2	3-5	12	0	1	0	14
James O'Donnell	F	20	5-7	0-0	3-4	3	2	0	0	13
Joel Foxwell	G	38	4-14	2-8	0-0	4	10	3	0	10
Mikah Ballew	G	27	3-10	3-10	0-0	5	1	2	0	9
Jermaine Ballisager Webb	C	20	3-5	0-2	0-0	5	0	0	0	6
Dante Censori-Hercules	G	28	2-4	0-2	0-0	6	5	1	1	4
Garrett Nuckolls	G	12	2-5	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	1	4
Matúš Hronský	F	16	1-8	1-7	0-0	0	0	0	1	3
NaVaughn Long	G	8	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Pepperdine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Aaron Clark	G	36	6-14	2-6	4-7	8	4	1	18
Styles Phipps	G	36	5-11	1-2	5-7	6	1	4	16
Yonatan Levy	F	33	4-5	1-2	2-2	5	1	1	11
Danilo Dožic	C	36	4-8	1-4	0-2	4	1	1	9
David Mager	G	17	3-4	2-3	0-0	2	0	0	8
Javon Cooley	G	27	2-9	0-6	1-2	5	2	1	5
Pavle Stošic	F	5	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0
Stefan Cicic	C	5	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0
Luka Vudragovic	G	5	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.4Possessions67.4

93.5Offensive Efficiency99.4

99.4Defensive Efficiency93.5

-5.9Net Efficiency5.9

43.2%Effective FG%51.9%

44.8%True Shooting %53.6%

17.6%Turnover Rate19.5%

13.6%Free Throw Rate37.7%

50.0%3-Point Rate43.4%

1.50Assist / Turnover0.69

Game Summary

Pepperdine won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 67.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.