
Binghamton
8-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
17.3%Binghamton
82.7%UAlbany
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAlbany -10.9
PROJECTED TOTAL137.7
MODEL MONEYLINEUAlbany -478

UAlbany
11-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBinghamton 63
Projected Total137.7
Projected ScoreUAlbany 74
Team Comparison
32.4MMH Power Index41.9
102.2Offensive Efficiency107.9
112.3Defensive Efficiency108.8
-10.1Net Efficiency-0.9
-6.0Strength of Schedule-6.1
-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency0.0
64.2Tempo64.3
51.3%Effective FG%52.8%
18.5%Turnover Rate18.6%
21.5%Offensive Rebound %34.3%
42.8%Free Throw Rate25.0%
-6.5Average Margin-0.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAlbany HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY82.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAlbany holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.9–32.4), offensive efficiency (107.9–102.2), defensive efficiency (108.8–112.3), net efficiency (-0.9–-10.1).
Binghamton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-6.0–-6.1), ball security (18.5–18.6), free throw rate (42.8–25.0).