Youngstown State logo

Youngstown State

14-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
15.9%Youngstown State
84.1%Wright State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWright State -10.8
PROJECTED TOTAL152.1
MODEL MONEYLINEWright State -529
Wright State logo

Wright State

23-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreYoungstown State 71
Projected Total152.1
Projected ScoreWright State 81

Team Comparison

46.7MMH Power Index57.1
111.6Offensive Efficiency116.4
107.1Defensive Efficiency106.5
4.5Net Efficiency9.9
-5.6Strength of Schedule-2.0
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency7.0
66.7Tempo69.2
54.9%Effective FG%55.2%
18.4%Turnover Rate16.1%
31.6%Offensive Rebound %33.9%
32.3%Free Throw Rate38.3%
3.0Average Margin6.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Wright State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWright State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (57.1–46.7), offensive efficiency (116.4–111.6), defensive efficiency (106.5–107.1), net efficiency (9.9–4.5).
Final
Youngstown State logo
Youngstown State
83—93
Wright State logo
Wright State
Wright State by 10 • 65.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Youngstown StateTEAM STATWright State
29-62FG32-60
47.0%FG%53.0%
14-323PT5-9
44.0%3PT%56.0%
11-14FT24-28
79.0%FT%86.0%
27Rebounds38
13Offensive Rebounds15
16Assists10
10Turnovers7
4Steals10
5Blocks4
22Fouls16

Player Box Score

Youngstown State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Bryson DawkinsG338-133-70-141000019
Vlad SalaridzeF246-143-72-274110017
Jaiden HaynesG324-73-40-020000011
Jason NelsonG183-82-43-402200011
Imanuel ZorgvolC164-50-03-311040011
Rich RolfF331-31-22-24200005
Drew KingG221-41-21-24510004
Cam PolakG81-11-10-01000003
Cris CarrollF141-70-50-02100002
Wright State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
TJ BurchG359-140-06-657410024
Kellen PickettF316-120-06-792020018
Dominic PangonisG355-61-16-951200017
Solomon CallaghanG295-83-52-210000015
Sam AlamutuG283-60-12-28030008
Michael CooperG151-70-12-22000004
Andrea HoldenF92-50-00-03011004
Logan WoodsG181-21-10-00000003

Advanced Game Stats

65.5Possessions65.5
126.7Offensive Efficiency142.0
142.0Defensive Efficiency126.7
-15.3Net Efficiency15.3
58.1%Effective FG%57.5%
60.5%True Shooting %63.4%
15.2%Turnover Rate10.7%
22.6%Free Throw Rate46.7%
51.6%3-Point Rate15.0%
1.60Assist / Turnover1.43
Game Summary
Wright State won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 65.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.