
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
71.2%Hofstra
28.8%Stony Brook
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -4.6
PROJECTED TOTAL142.7
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -247

Stony Brook
17-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 74
Projected Total142.7
Projected ScoreStony Brook 69
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index46.6
114.0Offensive Efficiency105.9
100.9Defensive Efficiency105.0
13.1Net Efficiency0.9
-2.9Strength of Schedule-0.7
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.8
66.2Tempo67.7
52.2%Effective FG%51.0%
16.1%Turnover Rate16.6%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %28.5%
32.0%Free Throw Rate28.9%
8.7Average Margin0.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY71.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–46.6), offensive efficiency (114.0–105.9), defensive efficiency (100.9–105.0), net efficiency (13.1–0.9).
Stony Brook COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.7–-2.9).