
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
45.9%Queens University
54.1%Florida Gulf Coast
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFlorida Gulf Coast -2.7
PROJECTED TOTAL165.6
MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida Gulf Coast -118

Florida Gulf Coast
16-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 81
Projected Total165.6
Projected ScoreFlorida Gulf Coast 84
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index48.6
118.4Offensive Efficiency110.5
117.0Defensive Efficiency109.2
1.4Net Efficiency1.3
0.1Strength of Schedule-1.8
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency0.7
71.4Tempo70.0
56.6%Effective FG%52.1%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.7%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %32.3%
37.6%Free Throw Rate29.9%
0.9Average Margin0.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY54.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–48.6), offensive efficiency (118.4–110.5), net efficiency (1.4–1.3), strength of schedule (0.1–-1.8).
Florida Gulf Coast COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (109.2–117.0), offensive rebounding (32.3–29.6).