
UTEP
11-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
50.4%UTEP
49.6%Delaware
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDelaware -0.8
PROJECTED TOTAL141.7
MODEL MONEYLINEUTEP -102

Delaware
10-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUTEP 70
Projected Total141.7
Projected ScoreDelaware 71
Team Comparison
44.4MMH Power Index39.7
102.6Offensive Efficiency103.3
107.1Defensive Efficiency112.9
-4.5Net Efficiency-9.6
1.7Strength of Schedule3.4
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-9.8
67.6Tempo65.5
49.2%Effective FG%52.9%
17.3%Turnover Rate18.4%
27.6%Offensive Rebound %20.5%
35.6%Free Throw Rate31.2%
-3.1Average Margin-6.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UTEP HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUTEP holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.4–39.7), defensive efficiency (107.1–112.9), net efficiency (-4.5–-9.6), recent form (-4.7–-9.8).
Delaware COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (103.3–102.6), strength of schedule (3.4–1.7), shooting efficiency (52.9–49.2).