
Toledo
19-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
48.7%Toledo
51.3%Kent State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKent State -2.0
PROJECTED TOTAL165.4
MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -105

Kent State
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreToledo 82
Projected Total165.4
Projected ScoreKent State 84
Team Comparison
58.8MMH Power Index54.7
116.0Offensive Efficiency113.9
109.6Defensive Efficiency107.6
6.4Net Efficiency6.3
2.3Strength of Schedule-0.1
10.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1
69.8Tempo74.0
55.1%Effective FG%53.0%
14.6%Turnover Rate17.7%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
30.3%Free Throw Rate43.5%
4.5Average Margin4.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Toledo HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY51.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMToledo holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.8–54.7), offensive efficiency (116.0–113.9), net efficiency (6.4–6.3), strength of schedule (2.3–-0.1).
Kent State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–109.6), offensive rebounding (35.0–30.4), free throw rate (43.5–30.3).