Toledo logo

Toledo

19-15
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
48.7%Toledo
51.3%Kent State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKent State -2.0
PROJECTED TOTAL165.4
MODEL MONEYLINEKent State -105
Kent State logo

Kent State

24-10
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreToledo 82
Projected Total165.4
Projected ScoreKent State 84

Team Comparison

58.8MMH Power Index54.7
116.0Offensive Efficiency113.9
109.6Defensive Efficiency107.6
6.4Net Efficiency6.3
2.3Strength of Schedule-0.1
10.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1
69.8Tempo74.0
55.1%Effective FG%53.0%
14.6%Turnover Rate17.7%
30.4%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
30.3%Free Throw Rate43.5%
4.5Average Margin4.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Toledo HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY51.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMToledo holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.8–54.7), offensive efficiency (116.0–113.9), net efficiency (6.4–6.3), strength of schedule (2.3–-0.1).
Kent State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.6–109.6), offensive rebounding (35.0–30.4), free throw rate (43.5–30.3).
Final
Toledo logo
Toledo
84—87
Kent State logo
Kent State
Kent State by 3 • 71.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ToledoTEAM STATKent State
28-59FG27-57
47.0%FG%47.0%
8-193PT7-24
42.0%3PT%29.0%
20-29FT26-36
69.0%FT%72.0%
29Rebounds37
10Offensive Rebounds13
15Assists16
11Turnovers9
5Steals7
3Blocks3
25Fouls27

Player Box Score

Toledo
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Leroy Blyden Jr.G316-114-73-562110019
Austin ParksC315-80-16-634120016
Sonny WilsonG386-132-51-346000015
Sean CraigF292-90-35-86000009
Kyler VanderjagtG213-62-21-21110009
Jaylan OuwingaF183-50-02-22100008
Mynor StrongG232-40-12-32120006
Will James Jr.G71-30-00-02000002
Tyler OdeG10-00-00-00000000
Kent State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Delrecco GillespieF3811-180-27-9133010029
Jahari WilliamsonG205-75-74-410100019
Cian MedleyG332-82-55-619200011
Rob Whaley Jr.F194-100-12-260110010
Morgan SaffordG251-60-53-34010005
Rayvon GriffithF162-20-00-28010004
Dezmon BriscoeF111-10-02-61101004
Quinn WoidkeG220-40-43-41300003
Brenden MossG51-10-00-00010002
Magnus EntenmannF60-00-00-01000000
Omer HamamaG40-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

71.9Possessions71.9
116.8Offensive Efficiency121.0
121.0Defensive Efficiency116.8
-4.2Net Efficiency4.2
54.2%Effective FG%53.5%
57.7%True Shooting %58.7%
14.9%Turnover Rate12.8%
49.2%Free Throw Rate63.2%
32.2%3-Point Rate42.1%
1.36Assist / Turnover1.78
Game Summary
Kent State won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 71.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.