Texas A&M

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

28.7%Texas A&M

71.3%Texas

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTexas -6.2

PROJECTED TOTAL160.8

MODEL MONEYLINETexas -248

Texas

21-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 77

Projected Total160.8

Projected ScoreTexas 84

Team Comparison

Texas A&MMetricTexas

58MMH Power Index61.6

116.1Offensive Efficiency119.6

108.4Defensive Efficiency110.1

7.7Net Efficiency9.5

4.8Strength of Schedule5.3

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.4

69.1Tempo69.2

53.5%Effective FG%55.1%

14.8%Turnover Rate15.5%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %35.9%

37.5%Free Throw Rate44.3%

5.3Average Margin6.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Texas HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.6–58.0), offensive efficiency (119.6–116.1), net efficiency (9.5–7.7), strength of schedule (5.3–4.8).

Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.4–110.1), ball security (14.8–15.5).

Final

Texas A&M

74—74

Texas

Tied • 62.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATTexas

27-53FG27-53

51.0%FG%51.0%

8-203PT8-20

40.0%3PT%40.0%

12-19FT12-19

63.0%FT%63.0%

30Rebounds30

6Offensive Rebounds6

14Assists14

6Turnovers6

5Steals5

2Blocks2

22Fouls22

Player Box Score

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rashaun Agee	F	33	6-14	0-2	5-8	11	3	0	0	17
Rylan Griffen	G	25	6-7	4-5	1-2	1	1	0	1	17
Rubén Dominguez	G	27	3-7	1-4	3-3	4	3	0	0	10
Jacari Lane	G	29	2-4	1-3	3-4	1	3	0	0	8
Ali Dibba	G	22	4-6	0-0	0-2	4	1	2	0	8
Pop Isaacs	G	21	2-5	1-2	0-0	4	0	0	0	5
Jamie Vinson	F	6	2-3	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	1	4
Zach Clemence	F	5	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Marcus Hill	G	21	1-4	0-1	0-0	0	1	3	0	2
Josh Holloway	G	11	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	2	0	0	0

Texas

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rashaun Agee	F	33	6-14	0-2	5-8	11	3	0	0	17
Rylan Griffen	G	25	6-7	4-5	1-2	1	1	0	1	17
Rubén Dominguez	G	27	3-7	1-4	3-3	4	3	0	0	10
Jacari Lane	G	29	2-4	1-3	3-4	1	3	0	0	8
Ali Dibba	G	22	4-6	0-0	0-2	4	1	2	0	8
Pop Isaacs	G	21	2-5	1-2	0-0	4	0	0	0	5
Jamie Vinson	F	6	2-3	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	1	4
Zach Clemence	F	5	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Marcus Hill	G	21	1-4	0-1	0-0	0	1	3	0	2
Josh Holloway	G	11	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	2	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

62.0Possessions62.0

119.4Offensive Efficiency119.4

119.4Defensive Efficiency119.4

0.0Net Efficiency0.0

58.5%Effective FG%58.5%

59.7%True Shooting %59.7%

9.7%Turnover Rate9.7%

35.8%Free Throw Rate35.8%

37.7%3-Point Rate37.7%

2.33Assist / Turnover2.33

Game Summary

Neither team finished level. The game played at approximately 62.0 possessions.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.