
Duquesne
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
38.6%Duquesne
61.4%Fordham
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFordham -4.3
PROJECTED TOTAL144.8
MODEL MONEYLINEFordham -159

Fordham
17-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDuquesne 70
Projected Total144.8
Projected ScoreFordham 75
Team Comparison
50.7MMH Power Index50.3
110.6Offensive Efficiency105.9
106.2Defensive Efficiency99.3
4.4Net Efficiency6.6
0.6Strength of Schedule-2.4
-5.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.9
70.8Tempo65.9
53.4%Effective FG%50.0%
17.7%Turnover Rate17.3%
30.6%Offensive Rebound %34.5%
38.2%Free Throw Rate26.9%
3.1Average Margin4.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Fordham HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY61.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFordham holds the advantage in defensive efficiency (99.3–106.2), net efficiency (6.6–4.4), recent form (-0.9–-5.9), ball security (17.3–17.7).
Duquesne COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (50.7–50.3), offensive efficiency (110.6–105.9), strength of schedule (0.6–-2.4).