
Bucknell
10-23GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.3%Bucknell
87.7%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -13.4
PROJECTED TOTAL148.7
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -713

Colgate
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBucknell 68
Projected Total148.7
Projected ScoreColgate 81
Team Comparison
35.7MMH Power Index48.8
99.5Offensive Efficiency111.7
112.8Defensive Efficiency109.0
-13.3Net Efficiency2.7
2.0Strength of Schedule-2.0
-11.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
67.7Tempo68.4
48.4%Effective FG%54.5%
19.0%Turnover Rate14.8%
26.6%Offensive Rebound %26.9%
30.7%Free Throw Rate30.0%
-8.9Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY87.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.8–35.7), offensive efficiency (111.7–99.5), defensive efficiency (109.0–112.8), net efficiency (2.7–-13.3).
Bucknell COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.0–-2.0), free throw rate (30.7–30.0).