
Columbia
16-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
69.6%Columbia
30.4%Brown
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColumbia -3.7
PROJECTED TOTAL145.1
MODEL MONEYLINEColumbia -229

Brown
9-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColumbia 74
Projected Total145.1
Projected ScoreBrown 71
Team Comparison
51.9MMH Power Index39.9
112.4Offensive Efficiency102.7
105.2Defensive Efficiency102.3
7.2Net Efficiency0.4
-1.7Strength of Schedule-4.9
-2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.1
68.2Tempo68.5
54.4%Effective FG%50.4%
19.1%Turnover Rate18.8%
37.3%Offensive Rebound %30.0%
28.8%Free Throw Rate28.2%
5.0Average Margin0.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Columbia HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY69.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColumbia holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.9–39.9), offensive efficiency (112.4–102.7), net efficiency (7.2–0.4), strength of schedule (-1.7–-4.9).
Brown COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.3–105.2), ball security (18.8–19.1).