Princeton

9-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

17.9%Princeton

82.1%Harvard

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHarvard -10.6

PROJECTED TOTAL137.8

MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -459

Harvard

17-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePrinceton 64

Projected Total137.8

Projected ScoreHarvard 74

Team Comparison

PrincetonMetricHarvard

43.5MMH Power Index52.6

105.1Offensive Efficiency108.1

110.3Defensive Efficiency102.9

-5.2Net Efficiency5.2

1.7Strength of Schedule-0.1

-8.2Last 10 Net Efficiency8.3

65.2Tempo64.8

50.3%Effective FG%53.4%

16.9%Turnover Rate17.2%

27.5%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

35.0%Free Throw Rate27.9%

-3.4Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Harvard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY82.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–43.5), offensive efficiency (108.1–105.1), defensive efficiency (102.9–110.3), net efficiency (5.2–-5.2).

Princeton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–-0.1), ball security (16.9–17.2), offensive rebounding (27.5–26.3).

Final

Princeton

80—87

Harvard

Harvard by 7 • 67.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PrincetonTEAM STATHarvard

27-65FG29-65

42.0%FG%45.0%

9-293PT10-26

31.0%3PT%38.0%

17-22FT19-23

77.0%FT%83.0%

42Rebounds36

16Offensive Rebounds13

10Assists16

8Turnovers5

4Steals4

1Blocks5

19Fouls16

Player Box Score

Princeton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Landon Clark	G	31	6-12	5-9	2-2	8	1	0	0	19
Malik Abdullahi	F	41	7-11	0-0	4-7	10	1	1	0	18
Jackson Hicke	G	43	7-14	1-5	2-3	4	2	1	0	17
Dalen Davis	G	25	2-12	0-4	6-6	3	0	0	0	10
Jack Stanton	G	41	2-8	2-8	3-4	5	2	1	1	9
CJ Happy	F	20	2-6	1-3	0-0	4	4	1	0	5
Jacob Huggins	F	21	1-2	0-0	0-0	5	0	0	0	2
Sebastian Whitfield	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Harvard

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Robert Hinton	G	41	12-19	3-6	0-1	2	3	0	0	27
Chandler Pigge	G	43	6-13	2-2	7-7	11	5	4	1	21
Thomas Batties III	F	41	6-14	4-7	2-5	9	2	0	2	18
Tey Barbour	G	36	3-4	1-2	6-6	1	2	0	0	13
Austin Hunt	G	29	2-7	0-4	0-0	7	2	0	2	4
Ben Eisendrath	G	22	0-7	0-4	4-4	3	2	0	0	4
Xavier Nesbitt	G	5	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Ryan Sullivan	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Dutch Dowdell	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Luca Ace-Nasteski	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.7Possessions67.7

118.2Offensive Efficiency128.5

128.5Defensive Efficiency118.2

-10.3Net Efficiency10.3

48.5%Effective FG%52.3%

53.0%True Shooting %57.3%

11.9%Turnover Rate7.4%

33.8%Free Throw Rate35.4%

44.6%3-Point Rate40.0%

1.25Assist / Turnover3.20

Game Summary

Harvard won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 67.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.