
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
68.9%Queens University
31.1%Stetson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -4.0
PROJECTED TOTAL165.2
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -222

Stetson
12-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 85
Projected Total165.2
Projected ScoreStetson 81
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index40
118.4Offensive Efficiency107.2
117.0Defensive Efficiency115.9
1.4Net Efficiency-8.7
0.1Strength of Schedule-1.0
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.9
71.4Tempo68.7
56.6%Effective FG%53.8%
14.8%Turnover Rate18.3%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %28.1%
37.6%Free Throw Rate33.6%
0.9Average Margin-6.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–40.0), offensive efficiency (118.4–107.2), net efficiency (1.4–-8.7), strength of schedule (0.1–-1.0).
Stetson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (115.9–117.0).