Miami

26-9

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

52.9%Miami

47.1%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -0.2

PROJECTED TOTAL145.0

MODEL MONEYLINEMiami -112

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMiami 72

Projected Total145.0

Projected ScoreClemson 73

Team Comparison

MiamiMetricClemson

65.5MMH Power Index59.9

117.8Offensive Efficiency112.6

103.0Defensive Efficiency101.4

14.8Net Efficiency11.2

3.6Strength of Schedule4.6

3.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

69.2Tempo63.6

55.5%Effective FG%53.0%

16.2%Turnover Rate14.0%

37.3%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

37.9%Free Throw Rate38.1%

10.3Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Miami HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.5–59.9), offensive efficiency (117.8–112.6), net efficiency (14.8–11.2), recent form (3.6–-4.7).

Clemson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.4–103.0), strength of schedule (4.6–3.6), ball security (14.0–16.2).

Final

Miami

59—69

Clemson

Clemson by 10 • 64.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MiamiTEAM STATClemson

21-54FG27-51

39.0%FG%53.0%

6-243PT8-17

25.0%3PT%47.0%

11-14FT7-10

79.0%FT%70.0%

34Rebounds28

11Offensive Rebounds4

9Assists13

16Turnovers12

5Steals12

2Blocks2

15Fouls13

Player Box Score

Miami

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Shelton Henderson	F	36	8-12	2-3	4-6	5	3	0	0	22
Malik Reneau	F	21	4-9	1-4	2-2	1	0	0	0	11
Dante Allen	G	21	4-8	2-4	0-0	2	1	0	0	10
Tre Donaldson	G	36	2-10	0-3	1-1	3	2	0	0	5
Ernest Udeh Jr.	C	33	0-0	0-0	4-5	17	0	1	1	4
Tru Washington	G	26	2-10	0-5	0-0	2	2	1	0	4
Noam Dovrat	G	10	1-3	1-3	0-0	0	1	2	0	3
Timotej Malovec	F	11	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	0	1	0	0
Salih Altuntas	F	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Carter Welling	F	29	6-10	2-3	4-4	9	1	0	0	18
Jestin Porter	G	33	5-10	1-3	0-1	1	2	3	0	11
RJ Godfrey	F	28	4-8	0-1	2-2	3	1	2	1	10
Jake Wahlin	F	21	3-3	2-2	0-0	4	0	0	0	8
Dillon Hunter	G	34	3-6	1-3	0-0	5	7	4	0	7
Nick Davidson	F	20	3-7	0-1	1-3	4	1	2	1	7
Ace Buckner	G	11	2-2	1-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	5
Butta Johnson	G	19	1-5	1-3	0-0	2	1	1	0	3
Dallas Thomas	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Chase Thompson	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.8Possessions64.8

91.0Offensive Efficiency106.5

106.5Defensive Efficiency91.0

-15.4Net Efficiency15.4

44.4%Effective FG%60.8%

48.6%True Shooting %61.9%

24.4%Turnover Rate18.8%

25.9%Free Throw Rate19.6%

44.4%3-Point Rate33.3%

0.56Assist / Turnover1.08

Game Summary

Clemson won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 64.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.