Quinnipiac

19-13

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

30.8%Quinnipiac

69.2%Merrimack

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMerrimack -5.2

PROJECTED TOTAL141.0

MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -225

Merrimack

23-11

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 68

Projected Total141.0

Projected ScoreMerrimack 73

Team Comparison

QuinnipiacMetricMerrimack

51MMH Power Index53.7

106.8Offensive Efficiency106.4

102.1Defensive Efficiency103.2

4.7Net Efficiency3.2

-2.3Strength of Schedule0.7

2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9

70.5Tempo64.4

48.9%Effective FG%49.3%

15.6%Turnover Rate14.8%

34.1%Offensive Rebound %24.7%

34.1%Free Throw Rate39.5%

3.4Average Margin2.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–51.0), strength of schedule (0.7–-2.3), recent form (12.9–2.2), shooting efficiency (49.3–48.9).

Quinnipiac COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (106.8–106.4), defensive efficiency (102.1–103.2), net efficiency (4.7–3.2).

Final

Quinnipiac

71—83

Merrimack

Merrimack by 12 • 67.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

QuinnipiacTEAM STATMerrimack

24-55FG25-50

44.0%FG%50.0%

4-123PT13-24

33.0%3PT%54.0%

19-26FT20-27

73.0%FT%74.0%

28Rebounds30

9Offensive Rebounds8

12Assists17

9Turnovers12

5Steals6

4Blocks6

19Fouls20

Player Box Score

Quinnipiac

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Amarri Monroe	F	38	8-17	1-3	7-8	5	1	4	2	24
Jaden Zimmerman	G	36	5-12	1-4	4-6	1	2	0	0	15
Asim Jones	G	38	4-8	2-2	3-4	1	4	1	0	13
Grant Randall	F	33	4-10	0-2	3-4	8	0	0	1	11
Keith McKnight	G	14	3-5	0-0	2-3	3	0	0	0	8
Nate Guerengomba	G	14	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	2	0	0	0
Spence Wewe	F	11	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	3	0	1	0
Samson Reilly	G	6	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Sam Nosakhare	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-1	1	0	0	0	0
Tai Turnage	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Braylan Ritvo	F	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Merrimack

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kevair Kennedy	G	40	7-14	1-2	8-9	8	6	1	0	23
Ernest Shelton	G	40	5-12	5-10	2-3	5	0	0	0	17
Tye Dorset	G	32	5-9	4-7	2-2	4	2	3	1	16
Todd Brogna	F	36	2-4	2-2	4-7	5	5	1	1	10
KC Ugwuakazi	F	15	3-3	0-0	4-6	3	1	0	3	10
Dylan Veillette	F	8	2-4	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	1	4
Andrés Marrero	G	29	1-4	1-3	0-0	1	3	1	0	3

Advanced Game Stats

67.1Possessions67.1

105.8Offensive Efficiency123.7

123.7Defensive Efficiency105.8

-17.9Net Efficiency17.9

47.3%Effective FG%63.0%

52.7%True Shooting %66.1%

13.4%Turnover Rate18.0%

47.3%Free Throw Rate54.0%

21.8%3-Point Rate48.0%

1.33Assist / Turnover1.42

Game Summary

Merrimack won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 67.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.