Lindenwood

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

30.1%Lindenwood

69.9%UT Martin

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Martin -6.3

PROJECTED TOTAL141.5

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Martin -232

UT Martin

22-11

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreLindenwood 68

Projected Total141.5

Projected ScoreUT Martin 74

Team Comparison

LindenwoodMetricUT Martin

46.8MMH Power Index49.8

105.5Offensive Efficiency103.8

98.6Defensive Efficiency94.0

6.9Net Efficiency9.8

-6.8Strength of Schedule-4.8

-1.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.8

73.7Tempo67.2

50.2%Effective FG%49.5%

18.3%Turnover Rate21.4%

34.0%Offensive Rebound %37.9%

37.9%Free Throw Rate37.5%

5.1Average Margin6.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Martin HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY69.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Martin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (49.8–46.8), defensive efficiency (94.0–98.6), net efficiency (9.8–6.9), strength of schedule (-4.8–-6.8).

Lindenwood COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (105.5–103.8), shooting efficiency (50.2–49.5), ball security (18.3–21.4).

Final

Lindenwood

55—69

UT Martin

UT Martin by 14 • 71.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LindenwoodTEAM STATUT Martin

18-53FG27-61

34.0%FG%44.0%

2-193PT7-23

11.0%3PT%30.0%

17-27FT8-11

63.0%FT%73.0%

35Rebounds41

12Offensive Rebounds12

6Assists15

17Turnovers17

14Steals11

3Blocks8

13Fouls20

Player Box Score

Lindenwood

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dontrez Williams	G	36	8-18	0-6	4-6	5	0	5	1	20
Anias Futrell	G	37	2-11	0-4	6-6	5	1	3	1	10
Clayton Jackson	G	21	2-7	1-3	3-4	5	2	0	0	8
Jadis Jones	G	35	3-5	0-0	1-3	6	2	2	1	7
Milos Nenadic	C	30	2-6	0-2	2-6	4	1	1	0	6
Mekhi Cooper	G	27	1-6	1-4	0-0	4	0	3	0	3
Robert Lewis	F	13	0-0	0-0	1-2	1	0	0	0	1
Todd Bieg	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UT Martin

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Afan Trnka	G	36	6-12	3-5	2-2	3	2	1	1	17
Matas Deniusas	F	31	5-8	1-1	3-3	7	3	3	4	14
Andrija Bukumirovic	F	29	7-12	0-2	0-0	6	1	0	0	14
Pedro Santos	G	21	4-11	2-6	1-2	7	0	0	0	11
Luca Colceag	F	19	2-7	1-4	0-0	3	1	1	1	5
Vladimir Khryapa	F	22	2-5	0-1	0-0	4	2	5	1	4
Lamine Niang	F	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	1	2
Ty Price	G	1	0-0	0-0	2-2	0	0	0	0	2
Filip Petkovski	G	30	0-5	0-4	0-2	3	5	1	0	0
AJ Hopkins	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Damien King	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.0Possessions71.0

77.5Offensive Efficiency97.2

97.2Defensive Efficiency77.5

-19.7Net Efficiency19.7

35.8%Effective FG%50.0%

41.8%True Shooting %52.1%

24.0%Turnover Rate23.9%

50.9%Free Throw Rate18.0%

35.8%3-Point Rate37.7%

0.35Assist / Turnover0.88

Game Summary

UT Martin won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 71.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.