
McNeese
27-6GAME THAT MATTERSAT
66.9%McNeese
33.1%UT Rio Grande Valley
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMcNeese -3.4
PROJECTED TOTAL144.4
MODEL MONEYLINEMcNeese -202

UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMcNeese 74
Projected Total144.4
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 71
Team Comparison
66.7MMH Power Index55.8
117.4Offensive Efficiency112.6
98.3Defensive Efficiency103.1
19.1Net Efficiency9.5
-1.6Strength of Schedule-1.9
15.5Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3
66.0Tempo67.4
52.2%Effective FG%55.7%
13.9%Turnover Rate17.9%
37.1%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
37.7%Free Throw Rate29.6%
12.6Average Margin6.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
McNeese HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY66.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMcNeese holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (66.7–55.8), offensive efficiency (117.4–112.6), defensive efficiency (98.3–103.1), net efficiency (19.1–9.5).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (55.7–52.2).