Tulsa

30-8

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

59.2%Tulsa

40.8%UAB

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTulsa -1.7

PROJECTED TOTAL159.3

MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -145

UAB

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTulsa 80

Projected Total159.3

Projected ScoreUAB 79

Team Comparison

TulsaMetricUAB

64.8MMH Power Index56.9

121.1Offensive Efficiency110.5

104.8Defensive Efficiency102.9

16.3Net Efficiency7.6

0.0Strength of Schedule0.4

10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.9

70.2Tempo71.7

55.4%Effective FG%48.8%

15.4%Turnover Rate12.4%

33.8%Offensive Rebound %32.7%

42.4%Free Throw Rate36.9%

11.5Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Tulsa HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY59.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–56.9), offensive efficiency (121.1–110.5), net efficiency (16.3–7.6), recent form (10.3–2.9).

UAB COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.9–104.8), strength of schedule (0.4–0.0), ball security (12.4–15.4).

Final

Tulsa

99—77

UAB

Tulsa by 22 • 71.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TulsaTEAM STATUAB

39-64FG28-64

61.0%FG%44.0%

12-263PT5-15

46.0%3PT%33.0%

9-10FT16-22

90.0%FT%73.0%

37Rebounds28

6Offensive Rebounds9

19Assists12

10Turnovers5

2Steals6

4Blocks1

15Fouls13

Player Box Score

Tulsa

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
David Green	F	29	12-17	2-4	0-1	7	3	0	0	26
Miles Barnstable	G	31	8-11	6-8	3-3	5	2	0	1	25
Tyler Behrend	F	27	8-8	0-0	0-0	7	2	0	0	16
Tylen Riley	G	28	5-10	0-1	2-2	7	6	1	2	12
Jaylen Lawal	G	12	2-6	1-3	4-4	1	0	0	0	9
Ade Popoola	G	35	2-8	2-8	0-0	6	3	1	1	6
KJ Martin Jr.	F	11	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	3	0	0	3
Ian Smikle	F	13	1-2	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Romad Dean	F	13	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Leon Sifferlin	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

UAB

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
KyeRon Lindsay-Martin	F	31	5-9	0-0	5-6	6	1	1	0	15
Chance Westry	G	31	5-10	2-4	2-2	5	4	1	0	14
Jacob Meyer	G	31	5-14	1-3	2-2	1	0	0	0	13
Ahmad Robinson	G	27	6-10	1-2	0-2	0	4	2	0	13
Daniel Rivera	F	23	3-7	0-1	3-4	4	3	1	0	9
Evan Chatman	F	26	2-6	0-2	2-2	6	0	0	1	6
Ari Gooch	G	8	2-2	1-1	1-2	2	0	1	0	6
Salim London	G	19	0-5	0-1	1-2	1	0	0	0	1
Quaran McPherson	G	4	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.7Possessions71.7

138.1Offensive Efficiency107.4

107.4Defensive Efficiency138.1

30.7Net Efficiency-30.7

70.3%Effective FG%47.7%

72.0%True Shooting %51.7%

13.7%Turnover Rate7.1%

15.6%Free Throw Rate34.4%

40.6%3-Point Rate23.4%

1.90Assist / Turnover2.40

Game Summary

Tulsa won by 22 points. The game played at approximately 71.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.