Minnesota logo

Minnesota

15-18
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
11.2%Minnesota
88.8%Ohio State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADOhio State -13.2
PROJECTED TOTAL145.6
MODEL MONEYLINEOhio State -793
Ohio State logo

Ohio State

21-13
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMinnesota 66
Projected Total145.6
Projected ScoreOhio State 79

Team Comparison

50.5MMH Power Index64.5
109.1Offensive Efficiency118.1
107.7Defensive Efficiency108.1
1.4Net Efficiency10.0
3.2Strength of Schedule6.4
-6.6Last 10 Net Efficiency6.3
63.6Tempo67.2
54.1%Effective FG%56.9%
16.5%Turnover Rate15.3%
26.5%Offensive Rebound %30.7%
36.9%Free Throw Rate38.3%
0.9Average Margin6.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Ohio State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY88.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMOhio State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.5–50.5), offensive efficiency (118.1–109.1), net efficiency (10.0–1.4), strength of schedule (6.4–3.2).
Minnesota COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (107.7–108.1).
Final
Minnesota logo
Minnesota
74—82
Ohio State logo
Ohio State
Ohio State by 8 • 70.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MinnesotaTEAM STATOhio State
23-58FG31-65
40.0%FG%48.0%
8-273PT7-24
30.0%3PT%29.0%
20-25FT13-18
80.0%FT%72.0%
31Rebounds42
9Offensive Rebounds13
13Assists11
9Turnovers10
6Steals6
4Blocks3
19Fouls20

Player Box Score

Minnesota
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jaylen Crocker-JohnsonF3911-191-73-480110026
Cade TysonG333-62-47-751000015
Isaac AsumaG433-123-93-485320012
Langston ReynoldsG413-80-06-725200012
Bobby DurkinF432-92-70-04100006
Grayson GroveF181-20-01-33000003
Kai ShinholsterG80-20-00-00101000
Ohio State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
John Mobley Jr.G439-195-113-332010026
Bruce ThorntonG429-161-64-673400023
Devin RoyalF416-141-53-552000016
Christoph TillyC285-100-11-252100011
Colin WhiteF191-10-00-02110002
Ivan NjegovanC160-30-02-29001002
Gabe CuppsG141-10-00-01100002
Amare BynumF220-10-10-05001000

Advanced Game Stats

70.3Possessions70.3
105.3Offensive Efficiency116.6
116.6Defensive Efficiency105.3
-11.4Net Efficiency11.4
46.6%Effective FG%53.1%
53.0%True Shooting %55.7%
12.9%Turnover Rate14.2%
43.1%Free Throw Rate27.7%
46.6%3-Point Rate36.9%
1.44Assist / Turnover1.10
Game Summary
Ohio State won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 70.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.