
Miami (OH)
32-2GAME THAT MATTERSAT
54.0%Miami (OH)
46.0%Kent State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMiami (OH) -1.2
PROJECTED TOTAL170.1
MODEL MONEYLINEMiami (OH) -117

Kent State
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMiami (OH) 86
Projected Total170.1
Projected ScoreKent State 84
Team Comparison
60.7MMH Power Index54.7
123.1Offensive Efficiency113.9
103.7Defensive Efficiency107.6
19.4Net Efficiency6.3
-5.6Strength of Schedule-0.1
5.5Last 10 Net Efficiency2.1
72.8Tempo74.0
60.6%Effective FG%53.0%
14.2%Turnover Rate17.7%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
40.1%Free Throw Rate43.5%
14.1Average Margin4.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Miami (OH) HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY54.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami (OH) holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (60.7–54.7), offensive efficiency (123.1–113.9), defensive efficiency (103.7–107.6), net efficiency (19.4–6.3).
Kent State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.1–-5.6), offensive rebounding (35.0–26.3), free throw rate (43.5–40.1).