
SMU
20-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
50.9%SMU
49.1%Wake Forest
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWake Forest -0.2
PROJECTED TOTAL163.1
MODEL MONEYLINESMU -104

Wake Forest
18-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSMU 81
Projected Total163.1
Projected ScoreWake Forest 82
Team Comparison
62.5MMH Power Index57.6
118.2Offensive Efficiency112.4
109.6Defensive Efficiency109.7
8.6Net Efficiency2.7
7.0Strength of Schedule7.2
-1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.1
71.1Tempo70.2
55.7%Effective FG%52.8%
15.7%Turnover Rate15.5%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %30.0%
31.3%Free Throw Rate36.1%
6.1Average Margin1.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
SMU HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY50.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–57.6), offensive efficiency (118.2–112.4), defensive efficiency (109.6–109.7), net efficiency (8.6–2.7).
Wake Forest COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (7.2–7.0), recent form (-0.1–-1.3), ball security (15.5–15.7).