UNC Greensboro logo

UNC Greensboro

15-19
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
81.0%UNC Greensboro
19.0%VMI
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNC Greensboro -6.7
PROJECTED TOTAL155.9
MODEL MONEYLINEUNC Greensboro -426
VMI logo

VMI

5-26
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUNC Greensboro 81
Projected Total155.9
Projected ScoreVMI 75

Team Comparison

46.7MMH Power Index29.1
112.6Offensive Efficiency105.1
115.3Defensive Efficiency117.4
-2.7Net Efficiency-12.3
-1.9Strength of Schedule-5.4
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-21.9
69.8Tempo66.2
52.8%Effective FG%48.9%
14.6%Turnover Rate14.7%
28.7%Offensive Rebound %26.4%
41.7%Free Throw Rate29.9%
-1.9Average Margin-8.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UNC Greensboro HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNC Greensboro holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (46.7–29.1), offensive efficiency (112.6–105.1), defensive efficiency (115.3–117.4), net efficiency (-2.7–-12.3).
Final
UNC Greensboro logo
UNC Greensboro
85—78
VMI logo
VMI
UNC Greensboro by 7 • 66.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UNC GreensboroTEAM STATVMI
27-57FG26-61
47.0%FG%43.0%
8-193PT13-37
42.0%3PT%35.0%
23-33FT13-22
70.0%FT%59.0%
41Rebounds36
12Offensive Rebounds12
17Assists10
5Turnovers7
4Steals3
3Blocks2
19Fouls26

Player Box Score

UNC Greensboro
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Justin NeelyF377-140-08-11223000022
Donald Whitehead Jr.G266-112-54-513000018
KJ YoungerG346-132-51-232000015
Lilian MarvilleG302-62-43-43200009
Clinton EfindaF132-31-13-60110008
Noah NorgaardG201-41-42-22300005
Valentino PinedoF301-40-02-26233004
Domas KauzonasF52-20-00-01000004
Landon KingG50-00-00-10100000
VMI
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
TJ JohnsonF385-125-113-4102100018
Tan YildizogluG367-161-73-543000018
Linus HolmstromG225-83-60-220000013
Mario Tatum Jr.G284-101-32-552000011
Cal ListonF203-53-50-05100009
Jaylen PazonG122-50-10-00110004
AJ ClarkG340-30-23-46112003
Walker AndrewsG100-20-22-20000002

Advanced Game Stats

66.1Possessions66.1
128.6Offensive Efficiency118.0
118.0Defensive Efficiency128.6
10.6Net Efficiency-10.6
54.4%Effective FG%53.3%
58.5%True Shooting %54.6%
7.6%Turnover Rate10.5%
57.9%Free Throw Rate36.1%
33.3%3-Point Rate60.7%
3.40Assist / Turnover1.43
Game Summary
UNC Greensboro won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 66.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.