
Tulane
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
21.0%Tulane
79.0%Florida Atlantic
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADFlorida Atlantic -10.1
PROJECTED TOTAL152.5
MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida Atlantic -376

Florida Atlantic
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulane 71
Projected Total152.5
Projected ScoreFlorida Atlantic 81
Team Comparison
44.3MMH Power Index51.6
105.3Offensive Efficiency110.5
109.9Defensive Efficiency104.4
-4.6Net Efficiency6.1
2.7Strength of Schedule-0.9
-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.6
68.7Tempo71.2
49.6%Effective FG%52.5%
15.6%Turnover Rate17.3%
22.8%Offensive Rebound %32.9%
44.8%Free Throw Rate33.9%
-3.2Average Margin4.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Florida Atlantic HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY79.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFlorida Atlantic holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.6–44.3), offensive efficiency (110.5–105.3), defensive efficiency (104.4–109.9), net efficiency (6.1–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-0.9), ball security (15.6–17.3), free throw rate (44.8–33.9).