Army logo

Army

11-21
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
40.5%Army
59.5%Bucknell
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBucknell -2.9
PROJECTED TOTAL147.7
MODEL MONEYLINEBucknell -147
Bucknell logo

Bucknell

10-23
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreArmy 72
Projected Total147.7
Projected ScoreBucknell 75

Team Comparison

36.8MMH Power Index35.7
104.8Offensive Efficiency99.5
112.1Defensive Efficiency112.8
-7.3Net Efficiency-13.3
-3.3Strength of Schedule2.0
-10.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.5
68.9Tempo67.7
49.8%Effective FG%48.4%
17.3%Turnover Rate19.0%
31.0%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
26.5%Free Throw Rate30.7%
-5.1Average Margin-8.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Army HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY59.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMArmy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (36.8–35.7), offensive efficiency (104.8–99.5), defensive efficiency (112.1–112.8), net efficiency (-7.3–-13.3).
Bucknell COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.0–-3.3), free throw rate (30.7–26.5).
Final
Army logo
Army
87—84
Bucknell logo
Bucknell
Army by 3 • 70.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ArmyTEAM STATBucknell
28-59FG29-60
47.0%FG%48.0%
12-313PT8-24
39.0%3PT%33.0%
19-21FT18-23
90.0%FT%78.0%
33Rebounds29
12Offensive Rebounds9
13Assists13
12Turnovers9
5Steals10
4Blocks3
17Fouls17

Player Box Score

Army
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jaxson BellG324-112-68-1051000018
Jacen HollowayF396-120-25-532110017
Jackson FurmanG395-124-90-052220014
Ryan CurryG375-122-92-212000014
Joshua EliF243-31-12-26200009
Jorn EversonF93-52-30-00100008
Tate LaczkowskiF191-20-02-27111004
Kevin McCarthyG161-21-10-00100003
Alex EngroG60-00-00-01110000
Dillon WattG40-00-00-00000000
Bucknell
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Pat CurtinG418-152-67-753110025
Achile SpadoneG437-150-34-593110018
Jayden WilliamsG415-143-74-511300017
Amon DörriesC355-70-13-442210013
Aleksander PachuckiG282-61-40-07110005
Quin BergerG161-11-10-20210003
Patrick O'BrienF111-21-20-01100003
Jacob MeachemG100-00-00-00010000

Advanced Game Stats

70.0Possessions70.0
124.3Offensive Efficiency120.0
120.0Defensive Efficiency124.3
4.3Net Efficiency-4.3
57.6%Effective FG%55.0%
63.1%True Shooting %59.2%
17.4%Turnover Rate12.7%
35.6%Free Throw Rate38.3%
52.5%3-Point Rate40.0%
1.08Assist / Turnover1.44
Game Summary
Army won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 70.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.