
Gardner-Webb
4-29GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.8%Gardner-Webb
94.2%Longwood
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADLongwood -20.5
PROJECTED TOTAL155.4
MODEL MONEYLINELongwood -1624

Longwood
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGardner-Webb 67
Projected Total155.4
Projected ScoreLongwood 88
Team Comparison
26.6MMH Power Index47
96.0Offensive Efficiency108.1
120.4Defensive Efficiency103.0
-24.4Net Efficiency5.1
3.3Strength of Schedule-6.4
-18.2Last 10 Net Efficiency2.3
71.0Tempo71.9
48.8%Effective FG%51.4%
19.2%Turnover Rate19.3%
23.6%Offensive Rebound %35.4%
31.5%Free Throw Rate42.0%
-17.3Average Margin3.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Longwood HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY94.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLongwood holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.0–26.6), offensive efficiency (108.1–96.0), defensive efficiency (103.0–120.4), net efficiency (5.1–-24.4).
Gardner-Webb COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.3–-6.4), ball security (19.2–19.3).