Troy logo

Troy

22-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
56.5%Troy
43.5%Old Dominion
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTroy -1.9
PROJECTED TOTAL156.0
MODEL MONEYLINETroy -130
Old Dominion logo

Old Dominion

12-21
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTroy 79
Projected Total156.0
Projected ScoreOld Dominion 77

Team Comparison

54.1MMH Power Index47.2
112.6Offensive Efficiency107.4
103.9Defensive Efficiency109.8
8.7Net Efficiency-2.4
-2.2Strength of Schedule-0.1
2.0Last 10 Net Efficiency4.1
70.4Tempo70.9
52.1%Effective FG%50.9%
17.1%Turnover Rate15.4%
35.3%Offensive Rebound %26.1%
36.8%Free Throw Rate35.2%
6.1Average Margin-1.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Troy HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY56.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTroy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.1–47.2), offensive efficiency (112.6–107.4), defensive efficiency (103.9–109.8), net efficiency (8.7–-2.4).
Old Dominion COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.1–-2.2), recent form (4.1–2.0), ball security (15.4–17.1).
Final
Troy logo
Troy
83—77
Old Dominion logo
Old Dominion
Troy by 6 • 81.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TroyTEAM STATOld Dominion
24-65FG28-64
37.0%FG%44.0%
6-263PT3-18
23.0%3PT%17.0%
29-34FT18-25
85.0%FT%72.0%
47Rebounds37
12Offensive Rebounds7
11Assists9
13Turnovers12
9Steals7
—Blocks2
17Fouls24

Player Box Score

Troy
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Theo SengF436-122-610-10140200024
Victor ValdesF373-151-514-1822100021
Thomas DowdF445-90-22-2151000012
Cooper CampbellG434-161-63-435400012
Cobi CampbellG412-62-50-01210006
Jerrell BellamyC133-30-00-04010006
Kerrington KielF181-30-10-04100002
Austin CrossG110-10-10-00000000
Old Dominion
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
KC ShawG4914-220-06-1041210034
Jordan BattleG444-122-66-690200016
LJ ThomasG314-81-13-443000012
Caelum Swanton-RodgerF314-60-00-05001008
Zacch WigginsG161-40-12-21200004
Jared TurnerF291-40-30-16110002
Robert Davis Jr.G430-80-71-23220001
Drew McKennaG70-00-00-02000000

Advanced Game Stats

81.6Possessions81.6
101.7Offensive Efficiency94.4
94.4Defensive Efficiency101.7
7.4Net Efficiency-7.4
41.5%Effective FG%46.1%
51.1%True Shooting %50.7%
15.8%Turnover Rate14.8%
52.3%Free Throw Rate39.1%
40.0%3-Point Rate28.1%
0.85Assist / Turnover0.75
Game Summary
Troy won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 81.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.