Stetson

12-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

20.0%Stetson

80.0%Lipscomb

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLipscomb -10.8

PROJECTED TOTAL154.4

MODEL MONEYLINELipscomb -400

Lipscomb

18-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreStetson 72

Projected Total154.4

Projected ScoreLipscomb 83

Team Comparison

StetsonMetricLipscomb

40MMH Power Index47.9

107.2Offensive Efficiency111.3

115.9Defensive Efficiency107.6

-8.7Net Efficiency3.7

-1.0Strength of Schedule-2.5

-2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0

68.7Tempo68.8

53.8%Effective FG%54.8%

18.3%Turnover Rate16.0%

28.1%Offensive Rebound %25.9%

33.6%Free Throw Rate26.5%

-6.0Average Margin2.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–40.0), offensive efficiency (111.3–107.2), defensive efficiency (107.6–115.9), net efficiency (3.7–-8.7).

Stetson COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.0–-2.5), offensive rebounding (28.1–25.9), free throw rate (33.6–26.5).

Final

Stetson

74—79

Lipscomb

Lipscomb by 5 • 80.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

StetsonTEAM STATLipscomb

27-65FG28-71

42.0%FG%39.0%

7-223PT8-28

32.0%3PT%29.0%

13-15FT15-19

87.0%FT%79.0%

47Rebounds35

11Offensive Rebounds8

14Assists14

18Turnovers10

5Steals11

5Blocks—

15Fouls14

Player Box Score

Stetson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Collin Kuhl	F	41	9-13	0-0	4-4	14	0	1	1	22
Alex Doyle	F	33	6-10	3-4	0-0	8	2	0	3	15
Jake Johnson	G	40	4-11	3-7	1-1	9	3	1	0	12
Calvin Sirmans III	G	35	3-11	0-4	6-8	4	3	1	0	12
Finley Sheridan	F	26	3-3	1-1	0-0	5	2	0	0	7
Ethan Copeland	G	32	1-9	0-5	2-2	3	3	2	0	4
Daniel Macgregor	G	13	1-6	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
J.R. Leonard	G	3	0-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Matar Diop	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Grant Asman	F	33	8-11	2-2	0-2	6	3	4	18
Ethan Duncan	G	28	5-11	3-9	0-0	2	2	2	13
Titas Sargiunas	F	38	4-16	2-9	2-3	4	5	3	12
Mateo Esmeraldo	G	33	2-4	1-1	7-7	3	3	0	12
Charlie Williams	C	29	4-13	0-2	0-0	3	0	0	8
Cole Middleton	F	13	3-8	0-2	1-1	2	0	1	7
Or Ashkenazi	F	21	0-1	0-0	4-4	2	1	0	4
Kennedy Okpara	F	16	1-4	0-2	1-2	4	0	0	3
Kellan Boylan	F	14	1-3	0-1	0-0	6	0	1	2

Advanced Game Stats

80.6Possessions80.6

91.8Offensive Efficiency98.0

98.0Defensive Efficiency91.8

-6.2Net Efficiency6.2

46.9%Effective FG%45.1%

51.3%True Shooting %49.4%

22.7%Turnover Rate12.2%

23.1%Free Throw Rate26.8%

33.8%3-Point Rate39.4%

0.78Assist / Turnover1.40

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 80.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.