
Boston University
16-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
41.5%Boston University
58.5%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -3.6
PROJECTED TOTAL152.3
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -141

Colgate
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBoston University 74
Projected Total152.3
Projected ScoreColgate 78
Team Comparison
50.3MMH Power Index48.8
115.3Offensive Efficiency111.7
113.1Defensive Efficiency109.0
2.2Net Efficiency2.7
-2.7Strength of Schedule-2.0
11.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
65.4Tempo68.4
58.6%Effective FG%54.5%
17.7%Turnover Rate14.8%
27.4%Offensive Rebound %26.9%
32.2%Free Throw Rate30.0%
1.5Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Boston University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBoston University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.3–48.8), offensive efficiency (115.3–111.7), recent form (11.2–-0.3), shooting efficiency (58.6–54.5).
Colgate COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (109.0–113.1), net efficiency (2.7–2.2), strength of schedule (-2.0–-2.7).