Miami logo

Miami

26-9
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
72.6%Miami
27.4%Syracuse
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMiami -5.2
PROJECTED TOTAL153.1
MODEL MONEYLINEMiami -265
Syracuse logo

Syracuse

15-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMiami 79
Projected Total153.1
Projected ScoreSyracuse 74

Team Comparison

65.5MMH Power Index52.2
117.8Offensive Efficiency109.2
103.0Defensive Efficiency106.6
14.8Net Efficiency2.6
3.6Strength of Schedule5.6
3.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-15.1
69.2Tempo69.0
55.5%Effective FG%52.9%
16.2%Turnover Rate15.6%
37.3%Offensive Rebound %29.0%
37.9%Free Throw Rate36.2%
10.3Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Miami HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY72.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (65.5–52.2), offensive efficiency (117.8–109.2), defensive efficiency (103.0–106.6), net efficiency (14.8–2.6).
Syracuse COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.6–3.6), ball security (15.6–16.2).
Final
Miami logo
Miami
85—76
Syracuse logo
Syracuse
Miami by 9 • 69.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MiamiTEAM STATSyracuse
33-54FG30-61
61.0%FG%49.0%
7-133PT6-21
54.0%3PT%29.0%
12-15FT10-15
80.0%FT%67.0%
37Rebounds21
8Offensive Rebounds5
20Assists13
16Turnovers6
4Steals11
4Blocks3
13Fouls14

Player Box Score

Miami
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Malik ReneauF348-121-23-3115000020
Shelton HendersonF386-90-24-534200016
Tre DonaldsonG295-82-34-435000016
Tru WashingtonG296-131-21-232100014
Ernest Udeh Jr.C314-60-00-16004008
Timotej MalovecF142-32-30-02100006
Noam DovratG32-21-10-01000005
Dante AllenG180-10-00-02310000
Salih AltuntasF40-00-00-01000000
Syracuse
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Donnie FreemanF327-110-20-041200014
Naithan GeorgeG314-112-63-445310013
Kiyan AnthonyG215-82-41-420000013
Nate KingzG254-71-32-222100011
William Kyle IIIF294-70-02-341120010
J.J. StarlingG273-100-32-21320008
Sadiq White Jr.F92-30-00-01000004
Tyler BetseyF191-31-30-01110003
Ibrahim SouareF70-10-00-00010000

Advanced Game Stats

69.1Possessions69.1
123.0Offensive Efficiency110.0
110.0Defensive Efficiency123.0
13.0Net Efficiency-13.0
67.6%Effective FG%54.1%
69.5%True Shooting %55.8%
23.1%Turnover Rate8.7%
27.8%Free Throw Rate24.6%
24.1%3-Point Rate34.4%
1.25Assist / Turnover2.17
Game Summary
Miami won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 69.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.