Brown logo

Brown

9-18
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
28.7%Brown
71.3%Princeton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPrinceton -5.2
PROJECTED TOTAL140.2
MODEL MONEYLINEPrinceton -248
Princeton logo

Princeton

9-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBrown 68
Projected Total140.2
Projected ScorePrinceton 73

Team Comparison

39.9MMH Power Index43.5
102.7Offensive Efficiency105.1
102.3Defensive Efficiency110.3
0.4Net Efficiency-5.2
-4.9Strength of Schedule1.7
-11.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.2
68.5Tempo65.2
50.4%Effective FG%50.3%
18.8%Turnover Rate16.9%
30.0%Offensive Rebound %27.5%
28.2%Free Throw Rate35.0%
0.3Average Margin-3.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Princeton HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
65
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPrinceton holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (43.5–39.9), offensive efficiency (105.1–102.7), strength of schedule (1.7–-4.9), recent form (-8.2–-11.1).
Brown COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.3–110.3), net efficiency (0.4–-5.2), shooting efficiency (50.4–50.3).
Final
Brown logo
Brown
5363
Princeton logo
Princeton
Princeton by 1063.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BrownTEAM STATPrinceton
20-61FG17-56
33.0%FG%30.0%
4-203PT7-23
20.0%3PT%30.0%
9-13FT22-22
69.0%FT%100.0%
40Rebounds39
12Offensive Rebounds11
11Assists10
10Turnovers7
4Steals7
8Blocks4
18Fouls15

Player Box Score

Brown
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Landon LewisF366-110-11-392230013
Isaiah LanghamG255-111-30-020000011
Jeremiah JenkinsG362-121-55-666010010
Adrian UchidiunoG333-142-90-01000008
David RochesterF252-60-12-27102006
N'famara DaboF272-40-00-04111004
Malcolm Wrisby-JeffersonG180-30-11-22111001
Princeton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dalen DavisG304-122-412-1253100022
Jackson HickeG366-131-46-6131300019
Malik AbdullahiF293-70-12-23002008
Jack StantonG252-42-40-03010006
Landon ClarkG321-71-22-24212005
CJ HappyF231-91-60-02210003
Jacob HugginsF130-20-10-03000000
Sebastian WhitfieldF70-00-00-01100000
Jacob HammondF50-20-10-02100000

Advanced Game Stats

63.9Possessions63.9
82.9Offensive Efficiency98.6
98.6Defensive Efficiency82.9
-15.6Net Efficiency15.6
36.1%Effective FG%36.6%
39.4%True Shooting %47.4%
15.3%Turnover Rate11.2%
21.3%Free Throw Rate39.3%
32.8%3-Point Rate41.1%
1.10Assist / Turnover1.43
Game Summary
Princeton won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 63.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.