Hofstra

24-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

52.6%Hofstra

47.4%William & Mary

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -0.3

PROJECTED TOTAL153.9

MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -111

William & Mary

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreHofstra 77

Projected Total153.9

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 77

Team Comparison

HofstraMetricWilliam & Mary

59.3MMH Power Index53.8

114.0Offensive Efficiency112.5

100.9Defensive Efficiency105.2

13.1Net Efficiency7.3

-2.9Strength of Schedule-1.5

14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency3.5

66.2Tempo73.9

52.2%Effective FG%55.3%

16.1%Turnover Rate16.4%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %26.7%

32.0%Free Throw Rate45.3%

8.7Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–53.8), offensive efficiency (114.0–112.5), defensive efficiency (100.9–105.2), net efficiency (13.1–7.3).

William & Mary COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.5–-2.9), shooting efficiency (55.3–52.2), free throw rate (45.3–32.0).

Final

Hofstra

82—89

William & Mary

William & Mary by 7 • 67.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HofstraTEAM STATWilliam & Mary

28-69FG30-71

41.0%FG%42.0%

13-323PT18-44

41.0%3PT%41.0%

13-15FT11-13

87.0%FT%85.0%

42Rebounds41

16Offensive Rebounds16

11Assists23

8Turnovers5

3Steals5

3Blocks6

15Fouls14

Player Box Score

Hofstra

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Preston Edmead	G	28	5-12	4-8	4-5	1	2	0	0	18
Biggie Patterson	G	22	5-12	3-6	3-4	3	2	1	0	16
Cruz Davis	G	40	5-19	2-8	2-2	4	3	0	0	14
Joshua DeCady	F	34	4-7	0-0	4-4	6	1	2	0	12
Joshua Aaron Reaves	G	27	3-7	3-7	0-0	6	0	0	0	9
Victory Onuetu	F	27	4-7	0-0	0-0	13	1	0	1	8
Jaeden Roberts	G	11	1-4	1-3	0-0	0	2	0	0	3
Silas Sunday	F	11	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	2	2

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kilian Brockhoff	F	25	10-19	8-15	0-0	4	3	1	1	28
Reese Miller	G	25	5-11	4-8	3-4	0	1	0	1	17
Ryan Jackson Jr.	G	18	4-6	1-1	0-0	1	2	1	1	9
Kyle Pulliam	G	27	2-8	2-7	2-2	2	3	1	0	8
Chase Lowe	G	22	3-6	0-0	2-2	11	4	1	0	8
Jhei-R Jones	G	18	2-4	2-4	2-3	2	5	1	0	8
Tunde Vahlberg Fasasi	F	27	2-6	1-4	0-0	7	1	0	2	5
Jo'el Emanuel	F	25	2-4	0-1	0-0	6	1	0	1	4
Cade Haskins	F	10	0-5	0-4	2-2	2	2	0	0	2
Finn Lally	F	3	0-2	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.2Possessions67.2

122.0Offensive Efficiency132.4

132.4Defensive Efficiency122.0

-10.4Net Efficiency10.4

50.0%Effective FG%54.9%

53.9%True Shooting %57.7%

11.7%Turnover Rate7.6%

21.7%Free Throw Rate18.3%

46.4%3-Point Rate62.0%

1.38Assist / Turnover4.60

Game Summary

William & Mary won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 67.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.