South Carolina

13-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

16.8%South Carolina

83.2%Texas A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -11.2

PROJECTED TOTAL156.1

MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -495

Texas A&M

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSouth Carolina 72

Projected Total156.1

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 84

Team Comparison

South CarolinaMetricTexas A&M

48.2MMH Power Index58

109.0Offensive Efficiency116.1

111.2Defensive Efficiency108.4

-2.2Net Efficiency7.7

5.2Strength of Schedule4.8

-15.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2

68.8Tempo69.1

50.4%Effective FG%53.5%

14.5%Turnover Rate14.8%

27.5%Offensive Rebound %31.7%

37.1%Free Throw Rate37.5%

-1.5Average Margin5.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY83.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–48.2), offensive efficiency (116.1–109.0), defensive efficiency (108.4–111.2), net efficiency (7.7–-2.2).

South Carolina COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.2–4.8), ball security (14.5–14.8).

Final

South Carolina

69—92

Texas A&M

Texas A&M by 23 • 69.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

South CarolinaTEAM STATTexas A&M

24-61FG33-69

39.0%FG%48.0%

9-253PT17-39

36.0%3PT%44.0%

12-12FT9-10

100.0%FT%90.0%

30Rebounds43

7Offensive Rebounds13

12Assists25

10Turnovers9

6Steals6

5Blocks6

11Fouls13

Player Box Score

South Carolina

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Meechie Johnson	G	34	7-12	2-4	10-10	4	5	1	0	26
Kobe Knox	G	38	7-14	2-2	2-2	5	1	1	0	18
Myles Stute	G	35	4-11	3-7	0-0	5	1	2	0	11
Mike Sharavjamts	G	29	2-7	1-4	0-0	5	4	1	3	5
EJ Walker	F	19	2-3	1-2	0-0	3	1	0	1	5
Hayden Assemian	F	9	2-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	4
Grant Polk	G	20	0-4	0-4	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Elijah Strong	F	14	0-8	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
Jordan Butler	F	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Zach Clemence	F	15	7-8	7-8	0-0	2	0	0	3	21
Rylan Griffen	G	24	6-11	3-5	1-1	6	5	2	1	16
Rashaun Agee	F	26	4-10	1-3	2-2	7	3	1	1	11
Pop Isaacs	G	24	4-9	2-7	1-2	4	3	0	0	11
Rubén Dominguez	G	28	3-10	3-10	0-0	4	1	1	1	9
Ali Dibba	G	16	4-7	1-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	9
Jacari Lane	G	24	3-5	0-2	2-2	5	7	1	0	8
Marcus Hill	G	22	1-5	0-1	3-3	6	2	0	0	5
Jamie Vinson	F	5	1-3	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Josh Holloway	G	12	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	4	1	0	0
Federiko Federiko	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.8Possessions69.8

98.9Offensive Efficiency131.8

131.8Defensive Efficiency98.9

-33.0Net Efficiency33.0

46.7%Effective FG%60.1%

51.7%True Shooting %62.4%

14.3%Turnover Rate12.9%

19.7%Free Throw Rate14.5%

41.0%3-Point Rate56.5%

1.20Assist / Turnover2.78

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 23 points. The game played at approximately 69.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.