South Alabama logo

South Alabama

21-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
36.0%South Alabama
64.0%Marshall
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMarshall -4.6
PROJECTED TOTAL154.0
MODEL MONEYLINEMarshall -178
Marshall logo

Marshall

19-13
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSouth Alabama 75
Projected Total154.0
Projected ScoreMarshall 79

Team Comparison

51.4MMH Power Index52
110.3Offensive Efficiency114.7
103.9Defensive Efficiency110.3
6.4Net Efficiency4.4
-3.7Strength of Schedule0.9
3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.9
67.4Tempo70.7
53.2%Effective FG%55.2%
12.8%Turnover Rate16.5%
24.9%Offensive Rebound %32.1%
39.8%Free Throw Rate29.7%
4.3Average Margin3.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

South Alabama HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY64.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
65
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSouth Alabama holds the advantage in defensive efficiency (103.9–110.3), net efficiency (6.4–4.4), recent form (3.4–-4.9), ball security (12.8–16.5).
Marshall COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (52.0–51.4), offensive efficiency (114.7–110.3), strength of schedule (0.9–-3.7).
Final
South Alabama logo
South Alabama
8084
Marshall logo
Marshall
Marshall by 464.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

South AlabamaTEAM STATMarshall
33-62FG30-63
53.0%FG%48.0%
5-173PT18-46
29.0%3PT%39.0%
9-13FT6-9
69.0%FT%67.0%
37Rebounds29
13Offensive Rebounds10
13Assists26
10Turnovers7
6Steals5
Blocks6
12Fouls16

Player Box Score

South Alabama
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Chaze HarrisG3611-200-16-858000028
Adam OlsenF368-155-90-040000021
Stephen WilliamsF289-110-01-3110100019
JJ WheatG253-40-10-03220006
Randy BradyF121-10-02-22100004
John BroomG221-20-10-07120002
Hantz Louis-JeuneG220-20-20-03000000
Jayden CooperG190-70-30-00110000
Marshall
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Wyatt FricksF3511-171-74-572050027
Jalen SpeerG366-136-120-087000018
Wilson DubinskyG254-114-90-052000012
Landen JosephG373-113-101-246200010
Caleb HollenbeckG133-53-50-01200009
Noah OtshudiG332-51-31-22720006
Erich HardingF211-10-00-00011002

Advanced Game Stats

64.8Possessions64.8
123.5Offensive Efficiency129.6
129.6Defensive Efficiency123.5
-6.2Net Efficiency6.2
57.3%Effective FG%61.9%
58.7%True Shooting %62.4%
15.3%Turnover Rate10.9%
21.0%Free Throw Rate14.3%
27.4%3-Point Rate73.0%
1.30Assist / Turnover3.71
Game Summary
Marshall won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 64.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.