Delaware State

8-22

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

20.1%Delaware State

79.9%North Carolina Central

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNorth Carolina Central -9.0

PROJECTED TOTAL136.3

MODEL MONEYLINENorth Carolina Central -398

North Carolina Central

14-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreDelaware State 64

Projected Total136.3

Projected ScoreNorth Carolina Central 73

Team Comparison

Delaware StateMetricNorth Carolina Central

28MMH Power Index35.8

91.4Offensive Efficiency104.9

105.5Defensive Efficiency110.2

-14.1Net Efficiency-5.3

-4.0Strength of Schedule-8.0

-16.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.4

64.9Tempo68.5

44.5%Effective FG%49.8%

19.8%Turnover Rate17.7%

28.2%Offensive Rebound %30.9%

34.4%Free Throw Rate39.7%

-9.2Average Margin-3.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

North Carolina Central HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY79.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNorth Carolina Central holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (35.8–28.0), offensive efficiency (104.9–91.4), net efficiency (-5.3–-14.1), recent form (-5.4–-16.4).

Delaware State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (105.5–110.2), strength of schedule (-4.0–-8.0).

Final

Delaware State

0—0

North Carolina Central

Tied • 0.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Delaware StateTEAM STATNorth Carolina Central

null-nullFGnull-null

0.0%FG%0.0%

null-null3PTnull-null

0.0%3PT%0.0%

null-nullFTnull-null

0.0%FT%0.0%

—Rebounds—

—Offensive Rebounds—

—Assists—

—Turnovers—

—Steals—

—Blocks—

—Fouls—

Advanced Game Stats

0.0Possessions0.0

0.0Offensive Efficiency0.0

0.0Defensive Efficiency0.0

0.0Net Efficiency0.0

0.0%Effective FG%0.0%

0.0%True Shooting %0.0%

0.0%Turnover Rate0.0%

0.0%Free Throw Rate0.0%

0.0%3-Point Rate0.0%

0.00Assist / Turnover0.00

Game Summary

Neither team finished level. The game played at approximately 0.0 possessions.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.