
UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
78.7%UT Rio Grande Valley
21.3%Houston Christian
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -7.6
PROJECTED TOTAL142.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -369

Houston Christian
12-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 75
Projected Total142.4
Projected ScoreHouston Christian 67
Team Comparison
55.8MMH Power Index39.5
112.6Offensive Efficiency102.5
103.1Defensive Efficiency110.3
9.5Net Efficiency-7.8
-1.9Strength of Schedule-0.6
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.2
67.4Tempo65.4
55.7%Effective FG%49.9%
17.9%Turnover Rate19.0%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %30.5%
29.6%Free Throw Rate37.1%
6.4Average Margin-5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY78.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–39.5), offensive efficiency (112.6–102.5), defensive efficiency (103.1–110.3), net efficiency (9.5–-7.8).
Houston Christian COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.6–-1.9), offensive rebounding (30.5–29.2), free throw rate (37.1–29.6).