
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
59.7%Queens University
40.3%West Georgia
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -1.1
PROJECTED TOTAL167.1
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -148

West Georgia
15-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 84
Projected Total167.1
Projected ScoreWest Georgia 83
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index43.6
118.4Offensive Efficiency107.4
117.0Defensive Efficiency111.6
1.4Net Efficiency-4.2
0.1Strength of Schedule-2.6
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency1.1
71.4Tempo71.3
56.6%Effective FG%50.4%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.8%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %32.1%
37.6%Free Throw Rate29.6%
0.9Average Margin-3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–43.6), offensive efficiency (118.4–107.4), net efficiency (1.4–-4.2), strength of schedule (0.1–-2.6).
West Georgia COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (111.6–117.0), offensive rebounding (32.1–29.6).