
Tennessee State
23-10GAME THAT MATTERSAT
61.0%Tennessee State
39.0%Lindenwood
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee State -0.7
PROJECTED TOTAL155.2
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee State -156

Lindenwood
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTennessee State 78
Projected Total155.2
Projected ScoreLindenwood 77
Team Comparison
55.4MMH Power Index46.8
110.9Offensive Efficiency105.5
102.7Defensive Efficiency98.6
8.2Net Efficiency6.9
-3.1Strength of Schedule-6.8
13.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.4
72.4Tempo73.7
50.9%Effective FG%50.2%
17.0%Turnover Rate18.3%
34.8%Offensive Rebound %34.0%
34.7%Free Throw Rate37.9%
5.9Average Margin5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tennessee State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY61.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.4–46.8), offensive efficiency (110.9–105.5), net efficiency (8.2–6.9), strength of schedule (-3.1–-6.8).
Lindenwood COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (98.6–102.7), free throw rate (37.9–34.7).