Mississippi Valley State logo

Mississippi Valley State

3-30
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.1%Mississippi Valley State
95.9%Grambling
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrambling -22.2
PROJECTED TOTAL144.4
MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -2339
Grambling logo

Grambling

14-19
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 61
Projected Total144.4
Projected ScoreGrambling 83

Team Comparison

17.7MMH Power Index41.4
91.1Offensive Efficiency100.7
117.8Defensive Efficiency100.4
-26.7Net Efficiency0.3
-4.1Strength of Schedule-5.7
-17.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.4
70.5Tempo69.9
45.8%Effective FG%49.2%
21.8%Turnover Rate20.9%
26.5%Offensive Rebound %30.4%
34.5%Free Throw Rate42.2%
-18.8Average Margin0.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
101
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–17.7), offensive efficiency (100.7–91.1), defensive efficiency (100.4–117.8), net efficiency (0.3–-26.7).
Mississippi Valley State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-4.1–-5.7).
Final
Mississippi Valley State logo
Mississippi Valley State
6283
Grambling logo
Grambling
Grambling by 2178.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Mississippi Valley StateTEAM STATGrambling
24-62FG28-52
39.0%FG%54.0%
6-243PT5-13
25.0%3PT%38.0%
8-15FT22-31
53.0%FT%71.0%
33Rebounds38
10Offensive Rebounds7
12Assists15
19Turnovers20
12Steals8
2Blocks4
23Fouls18

Player Box Score

Mississippi Valley State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Michael JamesG408-213-90-084200019
Xzayvion ChildressG384-111-73-430300012
Daniel MayfieldF234-81-32-450100011
Patrick PunchG344-111-50-11130009
Chance SuttonF111-30-03-44011005
Tyrone IroghamaG101-20-00-23000002
Mussa MzeinC91-30-00-03000002
Jonathan PaceF41-10-00-02000002
X'Zaevion BarnettG310-20-00-03721000
Grambling
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Antonio MunozF326-111-18-1443010021
Jimel LaneF337-111-13-6103120018
Roderick Coffee IIIF383-51-24-467300011
Derrius WardG233-72-42-221000010
Jamil MuttilibG203-80-33-31010009
Devyn FranklinG293-40-00-07030006
Saliou SeyeF52-30-00-01100004
Mekhi FittsF50-00-02-20000002
Chancellor PerkinsG31-10-00-00000002
Rickey BallardF120-20-20-03001000

Advanced Game Stats

78.9Possessions78.9
78.6Offensive Efficiency105.2
105.2Defensive Efficiency78.6
-26.6Net Efficiency26.6
43.5%Effective FG%58.7%
44.8%True Shooting %62.2%
24.3%Turnover Rate25.1%
24.2%Free Throw Rate59.6%
38.7%3-Point Rate25.0%
0.63Assist / Turnover0.75
Game Summary
Grambling won by 21 points. The game played at approximately 78.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.