
Mississippi Valley State
3-30GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.1%Mississippi Valley State
95.9%Grambling
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrambling -22.2
PROJECTED TOTAL144.4
MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -2339

Grambling
14-19MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMississippi Valley State 61
Projected Total144.4
Projected ScoreGrambling 83
Team Comparison
17.7MMH Power Index41.4
91.1Offensive Efficiency100.7
117.8Defensive Efficiency100.4
-26.7Net Efficiency0.3
-4.1Strength of Schedule-5.7
-17.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.4
70.5Tempo69.9
45.8%Effective FG%49.2%
21.8%Turnover Rate20.9%
26.5%Offensive Rebound %30.4%
34.5%Free Throw Rate42.2%
-18.8Average Margin0.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grambling HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY95.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–17.7), offensive efficiency (100.7–91.1), defensive efficiency (100.4–117.8), net efficiency (0.3–-26.7).
Mississippi Valley State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-4.1–-5.7).