Chattanooga

13-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

19.4%Chattanooga

80.6%Samford

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADSamford -9.0

PROJECTED TOTAL155.8

MODEL MONEYLINESamford -415

Samford

18-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreChattanooga 73

Projected Total155.8

Projected ScoreSamford 82

Team Comparison

ChattanoogaMetricSamford

45.9MMH Power Index54.1

112.7Offensive Efficiency113.5

110.5Defensive Efficiency108.3

2.2Net Efficiency5.2

-4.4Strength of Schedule-2.9

-0.1Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0

68.1Tempo69.5

55.1%Effective FG%54.0%

14.1%Turnover Rate13.3%

23.5%Offensive Rebound %25.3%

29.2%Free Throw Rate42.5%

1.4Average Margin3.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Samford HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSamford holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.1–45.9), offensive efficiency (113.5–112.7), defensive efficiency (108.3–110.5), net efficiency (5.2–2.2).

Chattanooga COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (55.1–54.0).

Final

Chattanooga

64—75

Samford

Samford by 11 • 62.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ChattanoogaTEAM STATSamford

20-48FG21-52

42.0%FG%40.0%

10-263PT10-29

38.0%3PT%34.0%

14-21FT23-36

67.0%FT%64.0%

34Rebounds37

5Offensive Rebounds9

13Assists13

7Turnovers4

1Steals6

4Blocks—

27Fouls19

Player Box Score

Chattanooga

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jordan Frison	G	27	4-8	1-3	2-3	2	3	0	0	11
Brennan Watkins	G	30	3-6	3-5	1-2	4	2	0	0	10
Jikari Johnson	G	22	3-7	3-4	1-3	3	2	1	1	10
Tate Darner	G	33	2-5	1-3	4-4	6	3	0	0	9
Collin Mulholland	F	15	3-8	1-5	0-0	3	1	0	0	7
Billy Smith	G	23	1-7	1-5	2-2	5	0	0	1	5
Teddy Washington Jr.	G	12	2-4	0-1	1-2	4	0	0	0	5
Josh Bowman	F	11	1-1	0-0	1-2	1	1	0	2	3
Houston Holland	G	7	1-1	0-0	1-1	1	0	0	0	3
Makai Richards	C	10	0-1	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	0	1
Parker Robison	G	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Samford

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Jadin Booth	G	40	9-16	6-12	4-5	3	3	1	28
Dylan Faulkner	F	27	6-10	0-0	6-14	13	0	1	18
Cade Norris	G	34	3-8	2-4	0-0	6	4	1	8
Zion Wilburn	G	24	0-1	0-1	6-6	5	2	2	6
Isaiah Campbell-Finch	G	18	1-5	1-4	2-2	0	1	0	5
Kam Martin	G	18	1-5	1-5	2-2	2	0	1	5
Keaton Norris	G	30	0-5	0-3	3-4	3	3	0	3
Will Shaver	C	9	1-2	0-0	0-3	1	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

62.1Possessions62.1

103.1Offensive Efficiency120.8

120.8Defensive Efficiency103.1

-17.7Net Efficiency17.7

52.1%Effective FG%50.0%

55.2%True Shooting %54.3%

11.7%Turnover Rate6.2%

43.8%Free Throw Rate69.2%

54.2%3-Point Rate55.8%

1.86Assist / Turnover3.25

Game Summary

Samford won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 62.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.