
Chicago State
7-25GAME THAT MATTERSAT
17.4%Chicago State
82.6%Mercyhurst
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMercyhurst -12.1
PROJECTED TOTAL138.6
MODEL MONEYLINEMercyhurst -475

Mercyhurst
17-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreChicago State 63
Projected Total138.6
Projected ScoreMercyhurst 75
Team Comparison
36.1MMH Power Index45.5
99.4Offensive Efficiency105.2
114.9Defensive Efficiency102.2
-15.5Net Efficiency3.0
0.5Strength of Schedule-5.7
-4.3Last 10 Net Efficiency3.2
66.2Tempo65.9
45.6%Effective FG%50.5%
15.8%Turnover Rate14.4%
29.1%Offensive Rebound %26.8%
30.7%Free Throw Rate25.4%
-10.3Average Margin2.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Mercyhurst HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY82.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMercyhurst holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.5–36.1), offensive efficiency (105.2–99.4), defensive efficiency (102.2–114.9), net efficiency (3.0–-15.5).
Chicago State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.5–-5.7), offensive rebounding (29.1–26.8), free throw rate (30.7–25.4).