
Tulsa
30-8GAME THAT MATTERSAT
84.4%Tulsa
15.6%Rice
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -9.8
PROJECTED TOTAL156.4
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -541

Rice
13-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulsa 83
Projected Total156.4
Projected ScoreRice 73
Team Comparison
64.8MMH Power Index45.1
121.1Offensive Efficiency108.3
104.8Defensive Efficiency109.2
16.3Net Efficiency-0.9
0.0Strength of Schedule-2.2
10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3
70.2Tempo68.3
55.4%Effective FG%49.7%
15.4%Turnover Rate17.8%
33.8%Offensive Rebound %35.7%
42.4%Free Throw Rate34.7%
11.5Average Margin-0.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY84.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–45.1), offensive efficiency (121.1–108.3), defensive efficiency (104.8–109.2), net efficiency (16.3–-0.9).
Rice COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (35.7–33.8).